News

Brexit Hangs Like a Shadow and a Pestilence Across the Land

The darkling skies of "Westmonster"

When it comes to nationalism, Britain is now the sick man of Europe.

The recent German election proved that. A formerly cucked nation now has over 90 nationalist representatives in its parliament, sniping at the weakened Merkel.

Britain, by contrast, has zilch.

Apart from a few DUP members from Northern Ireland, the only “nationalists” you will find in the UK Parliament are Celtic Cultural Marxists, like the SNP, who hate England and the English.

In almost every major European country, nationalism is represented on the political level in some form or other, whether civic, cultural, implicitly racial, or even overtly racial. The UK, by contrast, has become the desert of nationalism, where simply having racial nationalist beliefs is now considered “terrorism,” while actual terrorism is just a noisy prelude to hug-a-Muslim events.

Of coursh!

Worse than that, the ascendant political force in the country is now a Labour Party that is so left-wing that it would have been considered toxically unelectable in any year prior to the current one (it wouldn’t even get elected in Venezuela).

Make no mistake about it, the Labour Party is a clear and present danger. They have been ahead in the opinion polls since immediately after June’s general election, and the party has a lot of youth and energy in its ranks.

By contrast, its opposition is looking tired, old, and bedraggled, and more importantly unwilling to connect with a vast dormant populist base that is out there, ready for the taking, and which could be used to blow the Left to smithereens.

On the so-called right, we have just had the party conference of UKIP. They managed to change their logo to a lion with a rather pained and confused expression. Oh yeh, they also elected a boring-looking ex-Liberal Democrat bugman as leader. He immediately called a large part of his own party “Nazis” because they had dared to vote in the leadership contest for a lesbian who isn’t keen on Islam.

Really, UKIP, is that the best you can do? In that case, enjoy stumbling around like a zombie as bits of your body drop off.

Conference time

UKIP’s main problem is that it has no political function that isn’t served better elsewhere. Yes, it still postures hard on Brexit, but there are elements of the Conservative Party that do that just as well, and they have actual elected representatives in Parliament who can make a difference. What do UKIP have? Merely some members in the ineffectual European Parliament that they have successfully put out of a job.

UKIP are clearly bleeding members. Slightly more than 10,000 members voted in the recent leadership election, compared to more than 15,000 in the previous one less than a year ago.

But this is extremely odd because the party always existed as a receptacle for those on the right dissatisfied with the Conservative Party, but the fact is that the Conservative Party is a complete mess at the moment. Indeed, it is such a disaster that in the same way that the chaotic Middle East generates millions of refugees fleeing to Europe, the present Tory party should be generating droves of ex-Tories fleeing to UKIP.

The fact that it isn’t, means that something deep and sinister is wrong with the conventional model of British politics.

While Labour has a large membership of over half a million, the Tories, even while they are the party of government, are facing membership oblivion, with membership plummeting from 140,000 four years ago to 100,000 today. This has all come out in an interview with John Strafford, chairman of the Campaign for Conservative Democracy, in the leftie Tribune magazine:

“Membership of the party – which is a closely guarded secret – has plummeted from the two last published figures of 149,500 and 134,000 in 2013 to around 100,000. The biggest drop has been since June when the Tories failed to gain a majority in Parliament.

He says two well placed sources have told him the situation is so dire that in 300 out of the 650 Parliamentary constituencies party membership is now as low as 100 people or fewer.

The figure means that not only are the Conservatives well below Labour’s soaring membership of 569,500 but are either neck and neck or below the membership of the Liberal Democrats – who have also seen a jump in members from 61,000 to 102,000.

Mr Strafford said: “The party is facing oblivion. If you take the fact only 10 per cent of the membership is likely to be very active they will not have enough people on the ground to fight an election – they won’t even have enough people to man polling stations on the day.”

Along with the falling power of the Tory press to influence voters, this was a major reason why Theresa May did so badly in the June election. Her opponent Jeremey Corbyn was and still is a toxic Leftist twat, but compared to the Tories, the Labour Party had actual boots on the ground, and hands knocking on the doors, as well as more sophisticated tech-driven means of getting the vote out.

In recent years the one issue that really galvanized the British people was Brexit. Don’t believe the “just 52% voted yes” narrative either. If Jo Cox hadn’t been blown away by some loony that the media managed to spin as a nationalist days before the referendum, the Brexit vote would have been in excess of 60%. One reason Brexit was so popular that it could even overturn the combined might of the British and EU establishments, was because it channeled other, potent and more forbidden energies. For many, Brexit was essentially an expression of an ethnic British pride and spirit, and a proxy for anti-immigrant feeling.

Are the plague years of British politics upon us?

But since that glorious eruption, the country has been wading through a grim ash-strewn landscape of interminable and complex negotiation that has sucked the oxygen and energy out of British politics, especially for those on the right, whether in the Conservative Party, UKIP, or leaderlessly waiting for something more nationalist to manifest.

While Brexit remains unresolved it is hard to focus on other key issues and draw new battle lines against mass immigration, multiculturalism, Islamism, or even perennial Leftist economic illiteracy. This is because the nature of the future Brexit deal could cut across all of these. In this grey limbo land, the wider right is shriveling, while the Left seems oddly empowered by the darkening skies and encroaching mists.

Comment

64 comments

  1. genocidal_maniac 1 October, 2017 at 16:28 Reply

    What is really needed is a British…Richard Spencer.

    Head on attack and don’t back down on charges of racism. Actually go there where you straight up say to a black, “you were enslaved because African society is fundamentally weak and disorganized and that is a reflection of you as a person and the people like you and their genetics that your kind were never able to develop industry or technology on their own.”

    Only say it very politely and matter a factly in an upper crust accent while dressed respectably.

    The media would go apesht, but it would bleed and lead so the publicity would be massive. Continue it for long enough with these rolling debate fights and you change the Overton window substantially.

    • Yehudah Finkelstein 1 October, 2017 at 16:41 Reply

      Nick Griffin had the pedigree and a Cambridge degree, but cucked hard on Question Time with David Dimbleby.

      I always liked the Street fighting British Nationalists like Andrew Brons better than Griffin. Remember, the UK has way more class hangups and distinctions than America.

      • British Activism 1 October, 2017 at 17:02 Reply

        Yeah that show was a disaster. It was a complete trap, with even a changed format, where about 5 opponents (including the host) took it in turns to stick their knife in and turn it all into a circus act.

        Griffin had failed to prepare for this scenario (unbelievably!) and thought he would get to try and be ‘presentable’ and ‘moderate’ with just a mediocre rough-ride. It was car-crash TV.

        In fairness to Nick Griffin, I don’t think he managed to get more than five consecutive words out of his mouth – and he did a great job of turning the tables on the BBC and liberals, with many newspapers even condemning the bear-pit and the audience selection.

        This is all another flaw, as I see it, with the electoral system. When there are ‘leaders’ to damage, ‘voters’ to win, parties to infiltrate and collapse, it makes it so easy for the opposition to contain and destroy.

        A movement that has no core, no leaders, which means people are free to ruffle feathers, free to “give zero fucks”, free to “trigger” the hell out of everything….is much more free and harder to tackle, plus it injects society with new ideas and core subjects, not “congestion” and “over crowding” or “welfare”.

        • Yehudah Finkelstein 1 October, 2017 at 17:06 Reply

          I even remember Griffin had to take a question from some Kippah wearing Jew teenager who rambled about “Here Stands A man who Questions Muh Holocaust!”

          The most shocking part of that Question Time was some old working class bloke in the audience who probably went off script and said Enoch Powell was right!

          Britain is fucked with its first past the post electoral system. At least in America we have the electoral college bulwark which gave us Trump, and Germany has proportional representation so AfD got 90 seats in the Bundestag.

        • gas the skypes 2 October, 2017 at 16:23 Reply

          My dad is the biggest boomer cuck on earth and even he agreed that nick griffin on QT was bullshit

          Also Nick used to box for Cambridge.

    • British Activism 1 October, 2017 at 16:48 Reply

      Yeah, there is much work to be done in this country to shift that window. Too many still believe in the “slowly slowly” approach of “not talking the real stuff in front of the children {the voters}” and playing along at the fringes of “mainstream” {liberal} orthodoxies.

      Although they are sadly correct in their analysis of the British public’s apathy and confusion, there simply isn’t the time to vote our way out of this with such an approach. The shift has to come from within the soul of the nation, who will then go out and support what is necessary to be supported, no matter what form in manifests in.

  2. Nova Morium 1 October, 2017 at 15:43 Reply

    The Head of the Scottish ‘Conservative’ Party……

    A Jewish Lesbian……

    Ruth Davidson……

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Davidson

    I’m part Scottish……..

    It’s Fking Embarrassing……….

    When your ‘Conservative’ Party elects a Lesbian as your Leader……..

    You’re pretty much stating Publicly to the World……..

    “It’s all Over for us”……

    “We are in Decline”……..

    “Just leave us alone and let us Die in Peace”………

    • Yehudah Finkelstein 1 October, 2017 at 16:24 Reply

      She’s a Dyke but Davidson is a common Scottish surname (it’s common among Jews too) and all evidence says she’s a cucked Presbyterian Church of Scotland member.

      • Nova Morium 1 October, 2017 at 17:00 Reply

        Ruth Davidson…..

        Not hard to make a mistake on that one…..

        Ha!!

        Regardless, it’s Embarrassing and Sad…..

  3. Yehudah Finkelstein 1 October, 2017 at 15:41 Reply

    Brexit was retarded.

    Nigel Farage attacking white “Polish Plumbers” so he could close the EU borders whilst Pakis and Jamaicans from the Commonwealth stream into the UK. WTF?!

      • Yehudah Finkelstein 1 October, 2017 at 16:20 Reply

        That’s not what Farage said. He actually attacked Polish plumbers and talked about how he preferred Commonwealth immigration. Aussies, Kiwis, and Canucks aren’t immigrating to the UK….

        • Sturmmann 1 October, 2017 at 20:08 Reply

          That’s actually very true. Farage even went as far (I think more than once) as saying that he thinks British people feel culturally closer to Indians as opposed to Romanians, Bulgarians, Poles, etc – cause you know, muh British Empire!

          • gas the skypes 2 October, 2017 at 16:07

            He achieved brexit. If he’d gone full fash on the holohoax they’d have no platformed him and brexit would have died. I’ve got no problem with polish plumbers and much prefer them to pakis, nogs and kikes but frankly I don’t want ANY immigration into the UK.
            If Britain had sparked other exits from the union we’d all be getting our sovereignty back and everything would be improving.
            We live in such heavily jewed times

          • Yehudah Finkelstein 1 October, 2017 at 22:34

            The Cucking here is off the charts from Farage. “Muh Indian and black voters”, “Muh Oppressed Roma”, “Muh Evil Romanian Gangs”.

    • Crud Bonemeal 2 October, 2017 at 03:06 Reply

      “Racists nearly killed Ukip this week, but we live to fight our most important battle”

      by Nigel Farage

      30 September 2017 • 2:35 PM

      “Be in no doubt that if the anti-Islam candidate Anne Marie Waters had
      won the party leadership, there would have been a mass walk-out of which
      I would have been a part.”

      Farage actually seems to be a pretty bad guy

  4. Sharrukin 1 October, 2017 at 14:45 Reply

    Britain needs an unapologetic white nationalist party that doesn’t have a minority or a lesbian as the leader. Stop trying to pretend that you don’t want what you and so many others do want.

    Slightly less cowardly isn’t going to sell to anybody!

  5. Gubbler Chechenova 1 October, 2017 at 12:39 Reply

    On Catalonian Independence.

    Flight from white. Irish, Scottish, and Catalonians seek independence from white nation to merge with the non-white globalist world. They say NO to larger whiteness and say YES to even larger non-whiteness.

    Whites fight whites while welcoming non-whites as saviors and allies. No to Castilians, Yes to Moors.

    Narcissism of small differences.

    It is left vs left. Both Castilians and Catalonians fight each-other in white vs white war but both side welcome Afro-Moorish invasion.

    It’s like a white woman seeking independence from her own family to go with Negro.

    Irish, Scottish, & Catalonians want independence from whiteness to go with Africa. They see other whites as enemies or oppressors but see blacks & Muslims as allies and liberators.

    Catalonians make a big stink about Spanish repression & violence but enforce PC silence against anyone who denounces mass invasion & violence by Diversity.

  6. Diversity Heretic 1 October, 2017 at 10:26 Reply

    I spent 2015 and 2016 in London and have followed British politics fairly closely since leaving London. Colin’s analysis seems spot-on; the English seem to be sleep walking into oblivion. I’m personally hopeful that Brexit negotiations fail utterly and a hard Brexit takes place. Continental Europeans who want to visit or live or work in Great Britain–get a visa. Brits who want to visit or live or work outside Great Britain–get a visa. That type of arrangement is better than anything Theresa May can negotiate.

  7. British Activism 1 October, 2017 at 09:50 Reply

    Every aspect of mainstream British life, politics and media is channelled through a prism of ‘liberal’ or ‘globalist’ light. It has been this way for three generations.

    There is no national discussion on the fundamental problems of our time. They have to be filtered through the prism of liberalism, or talked at from a sideways angle that lets everything just carry on regardless.

    This prism manifests itself in the structure of all avenues that can bring about change – including party-politics, both in terms of funding prospects, how it will be treated in the media, the electoral system itself.

    Then there are the problems of scattered support, scattered demographics and cities where white people winning the vote – even if they were all in agreement with us – simply cannot happen any more.

    We have loads of parties. The BNP still exists, the National Front, Liberty GB is there for the counterjihadists.

    There are “patriotic” and more civic-nationalist parties like English Democrats and what was UKIP, for that “we’re not racist, we want people to come, providing they pay taxes” kind of idiocy, whilst genuine nationalists delude themselves that it is some “clever” game to achieve power then bring out their “secret” agenda.

    There’s a perfectly sound ‘bread and butter’ racial nationalist party in the form of the British Democratic Party, which was formed by the cream of the old BNP crop. That used to be my favourite after the actual BNP disintegrated, like all parties disintegrate.

    Yet, they are all tiny. Nobody is interested in any of them. There are layers after layers of disassociations, each other’s party being “not quite right” to make it to the “big time” {through all of the obstacles our opponent forces place against us} – and some laughably suggest that we need yet another one which can hit this magic bullet “sweet spot” between UKIP and the NF.

    Britain is indeed the ‘sick man of Europe’ in terms of nationalism. It is lost at sea. For whatever reason it is, the societal mood and structure is not conducive to surge a new AfD style party into political influence. UKIP could have been turned into that, but it failed.

    That being said, there is something there to ‘tap into’…..you can see it and feel it, both on the net and bubbling under the surface…. but what is it? What degree is it to? What form will it take? And how can it be best used?

    People are mumbling and grumbling, but I don’t think they yet have the tools of thought or language to use to defend themselves, what they might be thinking or feeling. The “prism” or prison of modern everyday life around them see’s to that.

    • Nova Morium 1 October, 2017 at 16:58 Reply

      Your People need to find your White Pride again……

      Prince Harry might get engaged to a Mulatto……..

      From across the Water it seems as though your White Society prizes Degeneracy…….

      …..and Dissolution…….

      We have that here everywhere also……..

      But, your Major Papers push it OPENLY………

      Here in America, even with Gay Marriage, we still have Open Public Objections…..

      …..to Homosexuality and Transsexuality…….

      We have Mainstream ‘Conservative’ Political Groups that have Power who oppose Homosexuality and Transsexuality…..

      I just don’t see any of that over there……

      You elect a Childless Theresa May……..

      I don’t get it……

      How hard is it to find some White British Pride??

      Not that hard…..

      Just read History……..

      And part of White British Pride……..

      …..should also include the Creation of America……

      Since, I’m pretty sure all of our Founders were Anglos………

      PEACE……

      • British Activism 1 October, 2017 at 17:20 Reply

        Although many nations are in the same boat, I don’t think it can ever be described in terms of what it is now like in this country. The prism I mentioned earlier is everywhere.

        We have not had any “conservatives” for nigh on 50 years. They have all shifted to the left, so much so that you’d hardly find any difference between Labour and Tories, despite the endless media attitude that they are somehow complete opposites.

        There is a suffocating tyranny over everything. Even the ‘resistance’ groups to this stuff seem to be half-baked or deemed so extreme that they are banned as terrorist organisations.

        With a two-party-state of either “Conservatives” or “Labour” getting to run the country, most ordinary folk vote for the “least worst” at any given time.

        The atmosphere and attitude in this country makes it very unlikely for people to find ‘white pride’, or even think they should or have to do so.

        Those who are “waking up” are waking up hard and going “full throttle” in a hardening up process. They have chosen to look, chosen to think for themselves, chosen to say enough is enough……. the general masses though? They don’t seem to care.

  8. Propagandist Hacker 1 October, 2017 at 09:48 Reply

    when it comes to explaining the lack of growth for the conservative party in UK, and also
    the lack of growth of white nationalism in general in the west, everything comes down to propaganda…the white nationalists are primarily young and white…and that means that their mindsets/perspectives are clustered around certain ideological areas–primarily the libertarian ideological cluster. In fact UKIP platform is strongly influenced by libertarianism ideology…that is a major factor inhibiting the growth of white nationalism among white nations….libertarianism is a loser, propaganda-wise.

    another factor inhibiting the growth of white nationalism is the failure on the part of white nationalists to understand history is important, and that western history is in large part centered around struggle of Labor vs Capital, and that our struggle today is still Labor vs Capital. It is hard to understand that if your mind has been captured by the tenets of libertarianism.

    you see, in order to win this fight we need to attract converts–white converts…whites of two types are of particular interest (besides white females, which I am not going to cover here): 1) leftist/liberal types; and 2) older whites.

    In order to convert category #1 we need to abandon the idea that we are fighting against socialism/communism. In fact, we are fighting against Capital. That bears repeating. Our battle to stop the immigration invasion is a battle against Big Business. Period. And that fact needs to be front and center in our propaganda. Propaganda that makes it clear that white/western nationalism is a battle against Big Business will help us win converts of the liberal/leftist persuasion.

    Why?
    –end of part 1; see parts 2-4 below in this thread

    • Propagandist Hacker 1 October, 2017 at 09:48 Reply

      part 2:
      Because leftist/liberals understand that Capital has always been the enemy of the working class since civilization began…instead we white nationalists adopt a libertarian stance. And we have been adopting an anti-foreigner/anti-nonwhite stance. And our propaganda reflects that. That is wrong.

      We should cast the immigration invasion as something being encouraged by Big Business in order to grow business profits via suppression of wages via cheap labor growth and growth in consumer demand. And that is the truth. Big Business seeks to use immigration to grow the supply of workers and consumers, thus growing the economy and growing profits. That fact needs to be front and center in our propaganda. That would help us attract liberals/leftists.

      But instead we take stance against nonwhites and often talk about IQ. That is a LOSER from a propaganda stance.

      Also, we need to look at the historical record and use history in our propaganda. A lot of the power that the establishment wields over whites is based on white guilt. Colonization by the West. Slavery, etc. But these “crimes of history” that are used to generate white guilt were really instead crimes of Capital against Labor. It was primarily rich people who owned slaves. It was the rich who drove colonization. Look at the 1860 american census. It shows that only 1.5% of all american whites owned slaves. The top 1%. And no surprise why–a slave cost 2 to 4 years income of the average white male. Cash or collateral. In today’s terms, you would have had to put down 100,000 to 200,000 cash down for a slave. Who has that sort of money for a business expense? The rich, that’s who. Also, about 4% of all slave owners were nonwhite. And that is all right in the 1860 census. Why aren’t white nationalists putting these facts right up front in their propaganda? And why aren’t we talking about how the rich owned all these businesses that ran colonial operations in the 1800s?

    • Propagandist Hacker 1 October, 2017 at 09:49 Reply

      part 3
      This is how we need to be countering the white guilt propaganda of the establishment. This is how we get into the minds of the liberal-leftist and convert them. By showing them that we are fighting Capital. That is something that liberal/leftist types understand. This is how we win them over and save the West. Oh, but just go talking about IQ and racial realism and Zionism. Because all that is really gonna win a lot of converts.

      Ok, now as for attracting older whites, whites who now depend on the welfare state. Or who will soon be depending on the welfare state. THese people have been paying taxes for decades. And soon they will be depending on pensions to help feed them and shelter them. Pensions they paid for with decades of taxes…

      And here comes the white nationalists, wanting votes. And who/what do the white nationalists see as the enemy? Oh, we see SOCIALISM/COMMUNISM as the enemy. Hmm….these middle aged or older white people think about it. Hmm…these white nationalists are against socialism. Hmm…I wonder what these white nationalists might do about my old age pension? Hmm…

      Do you see where I am going with this? Older whites don’t like white nationalism because white nationalists are anti-socialist, which could very easily be interpreted as being against the welfare state. Yeah, I know about how immigrants are abusing the welfare state. But do YOU know about how Big Business is using the lure of welfare to attract immigrants? Well, just be against the welfare state for IMMIGRANTS and not against the welfare state for WHITES. Then put that stance front and center in your propaganda. Why? Because we need older white converts in order to save the West. You understand saving the West, right? You do understand that socialism/communism is NOT the enemy here.

    • Oscar Madison 1 October, 2017 at 09:49 Reply

      “…Labor vs usury, and that our struggle today is still Labor vs usury…”

      Capitolism=state sponsored usury.

    • Propagandist Hacker 1 October, 2017 at 09:49 Reply

      part 4
      Big Business is the enemy. You do understand that Big Business is not any way, shape or form socialist or communist, right? Say that 10 times to help you understand: Big Business is not communist/socialist in any way, shape form or fashion. The reason the establishment pushes mass immigration/multiculturalism is because mass immigration grows the supply of workers and consumers, which grows the economy, which grows big business profits. We are fighting big business here, not socialism.

      Well, I am done casting my pearls…now turn again and rend me ….

    • Propagandist Hacker 1 October, 2017 at 09:52 Reply

      ok, part 5–one more thing: we need to have a positive slant on the future. We need to depict and envision a brighter future for the West based on how stopping mass immigration will help create a better West.

    • Flavius 1 October, 2017 at 10:19 Reply

      The problem is that , broadly speaking, in almost all countries nationalists are fighting against the left on social issues and against the right on economic and foreign policy issues.

      • Propagandist Hacker 1 October, 2017 at 10:22 Reply

        forget left vs right–it is the elite vs the white working class…it has always been the elite vs the white working class….redraw the divisions and do so with propaganda….that is how we attract converts

  9. Propagandist Hacker 1 October, 2017 at 09:42 Reply

    when it comes to explaining the lack of growth for the conservative party in UK, and also
    the lack of growth of white nationalism in general in the west, everything comes down to propaganda…the white nationalists are primarily young and white…and that means that their mindsets/perspectives are clustered around certain ideological areas–primarily the libertarian ideological cluster. In fact UKIP platform is strongly influenced by libertarianism ideology…that is a major factor inhibiting the growth of white nationalism among white nations….libertarianism is a loser, propaganda-wise.

    another factor inhibiting the growth of white nationalism is the failure on the part of white nationalists to understand history is important, and that western history is in large part centered around struggle of Labor vs Capital, and that our struggle today is still Labor vs Capital. It is hard to understand that if your mind has been captured by the tenets of libertarianism.

    you see, in order to win this fight we need to attract converts–white converts…whites of two types are of particular interest (besides white females, which I am not going to cover here): 1) leftist/liberal types; and 2) older whites.

    In order to convert category #1 we need to abandon the idea that we are fighting against socialism/communism. In fact, we are fighting against Capital. That bears repeating. Our battle to stop the immigration invasion is a battle against Big Business. Period. And that fact needs to be front and center in our propaganda. Propaganda that makes it clear that white/western nationalism is a battle against Big Business will help us win converts of the liberal/leftist persuasion.

    Why?

    Because leftist/liberals understand that Capital has always been the enemy of the working class since civilization began…instead we white nationalists adopt a libertarian stance. And we have been adopting an anti-foreigner/anti-nonwhite stance. And our propaganda reflects that. That is wrong.

    We should cast the immigration invasion as something being encouraged by Big Business in order to grow business profits via suppression of wages via cheap labor growth and growth in consumer demand. And that is the truth. Big Business seeks to use immigration to grow the supply of workers and consumers, thus growing the economy and growing profits. That fact needs to be front and center in our propaganda. That would help us attract liberals/leftists.

    But instead we take stance against nonwhites and often talk about IQ. That is a LOSER from a propaganda stance.

    Also, we need to look at the historical record and use history in our propaganda. A lot of the power that the establishment wields over whites is based on white guilt. Colonization by the West. Slavery, etc. But these “crimes of history” that are used to generate white guilt were really instead crimes of Capital against Labor. It was primarily rich people who owned slaves. It was the rich who drove colonization. Look at the 1860 american census. It shows that only 1.5% of all american whites owned slaves. The top 1%. And no surprise why–a slave cost 2 to 4 years income of the average white male. Cash or collateral. In today’s terms, you would have had to put down 100,000 to 200,000 cash down for a slave. Who has that sort of money for a business expense? The rich, that’s who. Also, about 4% of all slave owners were nonwhite. And that is all right in the 1860 census. Why aren’t white nationalists putting these facts right up front in their propaganda? And why aren’t we talking about how the rich owned all these businesses that ran colonial operations in the 1800s?

    This is how we need to be countering the white guilt propaganda of the establishment. This is how we get into the minds of the liberal-leftist and convert them. By showing them that we are fighting Capital. That is something that liberal/leftist types understand. This is how we win them over and save the West. Oh, but just go talking about IQ and racial realism and Zionism. Because all that is really gonna win a lot of converts.

    Ok, now as for attracting older whites, whites who now depend on the welfare state. Or who will soon be depending on the welfare state. THese people have been paying taxes for decades. And soon they will be depending on pensions to help feed them and shelter them. Pensions they paid for with decades of taxes…

    And here comes the white nationalists, wanting votes. And who/what do the white nationalists see as the enemy? Oh, we see SOCIALISM/COMMUNISM as the enemy. Hmm….these middle aged or older white people think about it. Hmm…these white nationalists are against socialism. Hmm…I wonder what these white nationalists might do about my old age pension? Hmm…

    Do you see where I am going with this? Older whites don’t like white nationalism because white nationalists are anti-socialist, which could very easily be interpreted as being against the welfare state. Yeah, I know about how immigrants are abusing the welfare state. But do YOU know about how Big Business is using the lure of welfare to attract immigrants? Well, just be against the welfare state for IMMIGRANTS and not against the welfare state for WHITES. Then put that stance front and center in your propaganda.

    Well, I am done casting my pearls…now turn and rend me again….

    • Propagandist Hacker 1 October, 2017 at 09:59 Reply

      spencer was wrong about brexit. And he does not even understand why he was wrong. Because he does not understand democracy.

      Democracy is weakened or strengthened by the structure of government and by the makeup of the populace. We white nationalists WANT strong democracy. Mass immigration is being pushed on us by the elites. So we white nationalists should NOT want the elites in charge. We should want the white majority in charge.

      How do we stop the elites from ruling? Ah, by increasing democracy. More rule by the white majority and less rule by the elites.

      Follow along with me closely here.

      A thought experiment: a nation of 100 people, all clones of each other.

      A nation of 1 million people, all related via family blood ties.

      A nation of 100 million people, all of the same race.

      A nation of 1 billion people, all of the same race.

      A nation of 100 million people, comprised of 2 races.

      A nation of 100 million people, comprised of 2 races.

      Now rank these nations in terms of cohesiveness and unity.

      Now, are the people going to find it easier to make the politicians obey them in a nation that is highly cohesive and unified, or will that be easier in a nation that is less cohesive and unified?

      Please respond in writing.

      • Crud Bonemeal 1 October, 2017 at 15:22 Reply

        Ok, let me clarify.

        Spencer was correct that Brexit was a potential distraction from building up an actual nationalist movement.

        Spencer’s position on the EU is, of course, unproven and seemingly quixotic.

        If you are serious about creating change via democracy, you have to take the mainstream poly sci criticisms of democracy very seriously… and maybe add a few of your own.

        And you have a tough road ahead of you, as an unsophisticated outsider trying to force change out of the elites that are ultra skilled at gaming the system.

        Even Trump has not gotten much done within the system, his positive effect was in the form of normalizing some important ideas and forcing the public to pick a side on them.

  10. Patriotic American 1 October, 2017 at 08:50 Reply

    UKIP is a stupid party name and only states the obvious – the U.K. is a sovereign nation. That is not a real political stance or world view. If there is to be a REAL nationalist party in the U.K. then it must work according to the principles laid out in Mein Kampf, they must have an all encompassing world view, take a strong stance on every issue and never back down from it in any way, shape, or form, and be absolutely fanatical in their resolve to accomplish their goals.

    • gas the skypes 2 October, 2017 at 16:30 Reply

      That is a good policy before you’re enslaved. Once the kikes take control of your civilisation you have to be more Machiavellian

  11. Alistair Michaels 1 October, 2017 at 06:54 Reply

    This is a wider than just Britain. This is very much an Anglosphere issue. I don’t know what it is with the Anglo Political Culture that lends itself to such cuckoldry compared to the folk of the Continent.

    • Giovanni Dannato 1 October, 2017 at 07:50 Reply

      As someone once remarked on, the Anglo culture is a culture of shopkeepers. Making more money by going along to get along and trying to be popular and please everyone is part of the culture. Paradoxically, despite the outward cheeriness, competition is more important than cooperation. The butcher, the baker, and the brewer certainly are not charities and would be insulted to hear of it.

  12. Churchillian 1 October, 2017 at 02:46 Reply

    Brexit can’t come soon enough. Anecdotally, my friends and family were split, but those that voted to remain have gone very quiet and are generally more critical of the ‘benefits’ of membership. Those that voted for Brexit seem doubly-convinced it was the right move. Two fears emanating from Germany: all those Middle-Eastern men getting EU passports and the acceding of Turkey to join the EU. What a sobering prospect: Ottoman Empire 2.0. They already have their janissaries in place in Germany.

    The Conservatives appear weak and divided. UKIP, BNP et al are hampered by the despicable filtering of the news by the mainstream media. But Brexit will happen. Then the border controls and so on can be demanded and our MPs will be held accountable. They will no longer be able to deflect blame to phantoms in Brussels.

    • Privada Machina 1 October, 2017 at 12:54 Reply

      You still think Brexit is going to happen? It looks dead in the water to the rest of the world that’s been watching tbvh. What makes you so sure it’s going to happen? And can you share with the rest of us, why you think this. Thx

    • gas the skypes 2 October, 2017 at 16:20 Reply

      I remember Teressa may saying she was powerless to deport our hate preachers because of European laws (while easily banning white nationalists)
      I would have thought she’d have deported them all immediately after the brexit referendum but the truth is all European politicians love the EU because they can pass the buck

      Brexit will be kicked into the long grass, they’ll pretend it’s extremely complicated and requires decades to work through, all the while they’ll pump up the propaganda (there’s a free newspaper read by millions on the London underground, it howls and grumbles about brexit on every page, every day. Once the sheep have been sufficiently traumatised against brexit they’ll quietly memory hole it and we’ll never hear the work brexit or referendum again

    • Churchillian 1 October, 2017 at 04:03 Reply

      Rightly or wrongly, we defended our islands. Listen, you will still get football hooligans chanting ‘Two world wars and one world cup’ and going toe-to-toe with the ‘Krauts’ — we’re a martial nation — but nationalism in the UK has moved on. No more brother-on-brother idiocy. The Germans are our brothers.

      • Savitri Devi 1 October, 2017 at 04:06 Reply

        Part of that was shitposting. But why is Churchill in your username? You do know he is property of Jews right? They bought him and that’s why were talking about England vs Germany instead of England and Germany vs Soviet Russia.

        • Churchillian 1 October, 2017 at 05:41 Reply

          I get that a lot on this site. I’m a Brit, what can I say? His speeches were tremendous. Oh, the rhetoric! Great fighting talk.

          • Harry Savannah 1 October, 2017 at 13:51

            “…what can I say?”

            How about, “Please educate me.” Hard to believe you are pro-White (or whatever). The fraud, mass-murder, and GUILT of the “Allies” is so irrefutable today and so great that it takes the clueless normie to make a statement like yours. I predict that GB will suffer a fate WORSE than 1945 Germany without a formal “Enemy” firing a single shot. I do not say I desire it, but I do say they will deserve it. And all very, very tragic for the Great Race.

  13. JosephtheGreat 1 October, 2017 at 00:43 Reply

    Hell, even I’d vote Corbyn before I’d vote Theresa May. Britain is truly one messed up country. But I guess it’s their prize for defeating Hitler.

    • Charley Howard 1 October, 2017 at 01:12 Reply

      Britain, France, the United States, Italy, ALL lost the Second World War … Doesn’t everybody know that ?? When they accepted and reveled in the defeat of the Axis power, they all signed their own death warrants. The Jews flat-out won the war; everybody else lost it !