News

Boomer Conservatives Are Losing Their Minds Over Charlottesville

The cuckservatives are losing it over Charlottesville. It’s all so tiresome, but here’s what they’re saying about us.

Boomer cuckservative: “You know, these Antifa, BLM, and Neo-Nazis are all crazy!  We’ve got to just stop this nonsense!”

Now for a center-right conservative, this is a very edgy declaration; they’ve just denounced BLM, which after all has Black people in it.  But just to be sure, they want to make clear that they’re not with the “White Supremacists” that the media keeps sternly warning them about.

Another boomer conservative response goes like this:

“Nazis are socialists, that’s why it’s called National Socialism.  These protestors aren’t on the right! They’re actually lefties!”

Let’s call this one, “Dem’s are the real fascists.”  Dinesh D’Souza is currently on this beat.  Truly cringeworthy.

Finally, you might hear the old double-standard complaint: “Obama never denounced Black Live Matter, so why should Trump blah, blah, blah.”  This is actually a sound point, but notice that it avoids discussing the merits of ‘Unite the Right’ or the Alt-Right writ large.

Rush Limbaugh, probably the smartest of the boomer conservatives, hits all these points with gusto.  The double standard complaint:

I’m telling you that Barack Obama invited Black Lives Matter to the White House and honored them after Ferguson and after Baltimore. You’re not supposed to mention that, but there were two sides to this thing… The point is that it’s not just the neo-Nazis and it’s not just the white supremacists and it’s not just these groups, but there’s a whole other range of similar hate groups on the left that are just as guilty and are just as invasive and probably more violent.

Sean Hannity has even grown fond of referring to the “Alt-Left,” which is frankly a ridiculous term. The left does not require an “alt” anything; they can quite freely express their ideas in the mainstream.  At best, this kind of talking-point is supposed to imply that the Alt-Right is just as morally bankrupt as BLM, etc., and the speaker is quite above both movements.  So the “double standard” argument, besides being cliched and boring, is in fact denouncing us in an oblique manner.

Next, Rush explains that Dem’s are the real Nazis:

The Nazis were not on the right of anything, and white supremacists are not on the right of anything. All of these groups are to the left of center.

In fact, the Nazis were right-wing.  That’s how the movement was understood in its time.  Nationalism is and always has been considered right-wing.  Who are they fooling?

Despite these misunderstandings, Rush proceeds in his program to identify exactly the grievances that many in the Alt-Right have, such as White males being blamed for everyone else’s problems, and being presumed to have “White privilege,” while actually having no advantage in this country whatsoever.  The Alt-Right encompasses more than these grievances; but to focus on them for a moment, wouldn’t these grievances justify a White identity-politics movement, which is exactly what the Alt-Right represents?

Rush explains:

And on the other side of this where you have the Nazis and the white supremacists, they’re told every day that they’ve benefited from white privilege. That’s the latest rage on campus, white privilege, understanding your whiteness, understanding the problem. These people can’t even find jobs, for crying out loud, and they’re being told they’re benefiting from white privilege, so they’re ticked off.

Finally, let’s remember that the ‘Unite the Right’ protest was using the Robert E. Lee statue as its focal point.  Protecting the monuments of historical American figures, including the Founders who are presumably up next, is quite a popular stance among great swathes of the American public, including these boomer conservatives.

This puts them in quite a bind.  If you perfectly understand the grievances and the perspectives of the “Neo-Nazis”; well, the media could call you a Neo-Nazi next.  And apparently name-calling is about the level of rigor which the American media is capable of.  Rich Lowry, for example, is perfectly prepared to denounce Antifa on Meet the Press, but he sure isn’t going to go out on a limb by explaining that the Alt-Right are not “Nazis.”  Hence, condemning us both is the safest route for the boomer conservative.

One almost feels sorry for them: how do they maintain their respectability while the logical conclusion of their ideas leads to the Alt-Right?  Being a boomer conservative in the media is not an easy gig.  It pays well, but requires massive levels of cognitive dissonance on all matters of cultural import.  Simply stated, that is why our analysis on all these questions is so much more cogent and straightforward.

Follow Malcolm Jaggers @malcolmjaggers

 

Comment

394 comments

  1. curri 27 September, 2017 at 17:29 Reply

    I remember when Rush was pushing the CIA Egg McMuffin line that Russia and Assad were actually allied with ISIS, not fighting them.

  2. Mateo Coronus 17 August, 2017 at 22:12 Reply

    National Socialist ideas are wrong, destructive, and lead nowhere, on the whole.

    Elements could be used, but is suicidal in its imagery, reputation.

    Do you want to win or feel right?

    • Smash Islamophobia 25 August, 2017 at 23:05 Reply

      Does Vox Day want to win, or does he want to hysterically countersignal imaginary not-sees until he spins out of control and spirals up his own fundament?

  3. baldowl 16 August, 2017 at 19:41 Reply

    I’ve got my dad coming to visit this weekend. He’s a boomer. My sister and I, who used to be the best of friends, have recently begun between us a cold war, her having decided she’s a feminist and me just knowing too much to be civil with her anymore. He’s an old man, and he can’t be saved, so I have to measure my words carefully when he asks why my sister and I don’t get along anymore.
    Otherwise, I’m doing a Sling trial, and I’ll buy him a bottle of scotch. I’ll give him a recliner, Fox News, and booze, and he’ll only remember having a great visit.

    • baldowl 16 August, 2017 at 19:42 Reply

      hahahaha. Hey, I just saw you over AmRen. They banned me! And to think I used to have that site bookmarked and visited/commented almost every day.

        • baldowl 16 August, 2017 at 20:49 Reply

          At one time, five or six years ago, I was a favored commenter at AmRen. But then I learned t✡✡ much and wouldn’t keep quiet about it. When I went back in today, for the first time in a year or two, I mistakenly thought they might be ready for some honest discussion, but they’re not!

          • baldowl 17 August, 2017 at 07:26

            I was. It will be back. Anglin’s on Gab, referring to himself as the most banned man in all of history LOL. The Stormer will return; they’re working on it.

  4. Creature0fthenlght 15 August, 2017 at 23:23 Reply

    I got news from someone that knows Alex Fields and they say he’s an
    idiot leftist that voted for Kasich to try and stop Trump from securing
    the nomination.. he was a bernie bro and didn’t even vote after the
    primaries.. pissed off that hillaruh stole his nomination. So NOW we
    know why he “registered Republican”.. Also said guy is semi- Mentally
    challenged. So there’s that.

  5. LA de Vall 15 August, 2017 at 21:55 Reply

    Rich Lowry is as close to a liberal democrat as you can get.
    As far as RUSH goes, he could retire tomorrow and live like a king. He’s made his money the last 25 years or so beating up on the left, but yet he still parties with them.

  6. General Lee 15 August, 2017 at 18:39 Reply

    Libbies at The Hill.com are the biggest, safe space pussy’s on the planet, bar none.

    I cant stand loser, safe spacer libtards anyway.

    Useless f*cks!

    Crybaby webmaster protected sissies.

    I feel much better now.

  7. swampwiz0 15 August, 2017 at 18:39 Reply

    I have for a long time had a healthy level of distrust with the conservative movement. Their masters are the moneyed class, just like in the days of the Rothschilds, and they were the ones that have blinked their eyes at the illegal immigrant invasion.

  8. General Lee 15 August, 2017 at 18:25 Reply

    Libs, try this.

    For every civil war statue you knock down we’ll just build 5 more.

    We can do that.

    Cool?

  9. General Lee 15 August, 2017 at 18:23 Reply

    Libs, we will CRUSH you.

    You’re trying to,

    Deny our vote.
    Deny our right to assemble.
    Deny free thought speech.
    And, you’re trying to erase our history.

    Not happening.

    Game on libtards!

  10. Charles Mills 15 August, 2017 at 18:18 Reply

    Proud white men ? All you of you should be ashamed of ya’ll selfs. Both sides protesting over the removal of some dumb ass statue. Who gives a f**k it’s 2017. We should be making progression as a country as one. It’s so sad that we are so divided as a country. An for all you “White Men” what’s your family heritage? You are not pure I’m so sorry break your heart. Richard Spencer I dear you to come to New Jersey. You’ll never make it out. I promise that “White Power ” these nuts in your wife mouth long dick style. Also for most of you southerns, please do me a favor an educate yourselves on your family background before you go hating others.

  11. General Lee 15 August, 2017 at 18:14 Reply

    Charlottesville is blowing up in Antifa Thugs faces.

    Truth is coming out about how it was a far left, Berkeley, police stand down situation.

  12. General Lee 15 August, 2017 at 18:12 Reply

    President Trump just hammered the FAKE media about the far left loons attacking the lawful permit statue marchers, protesters.

    He called out the Alt Left for not having permits and coming at the statue marchers with clubs, etc.

    The lefts Charlottesville story is collapsing anyway.

    I was saying Saturday he should tell the media to f*ck off.

    Today he did.

  13. Patriotic American 15 August, 2017 at 17:10 Reply

    I’ve been throwing this around at cucks, especially boomers, when they wig out and call us conspiracy theorists, evil nazis, right wing extremists, etc. and say we are wrong about Jews. You goys might find this useful.

    Soviet Government (1919): Summary

    Bureaucracy……………..Total number………….Jews
    Peoples Commissaries……………22……………………….17
    Provincial Commissaries……… 23……………………….21
    Commissariat of War………… 43……………………….33
    Foreign Affairs………………………16……………………….13
    Finance…………………………………30………………………24
    Justice…………………………………. 21……………………….20
    Public Instruction…………………..53………………………42
    Social Assistance……………………..6………………………..6
    Labour……………………………………8………………………..7

    Total number of Bolshevist Government officials in 1919 : 545
    Total number of JEWS in Bolshevist Government in 1919: 447

    The Central Committee of the Bolshevik Party was made up as follows:

    NAME NATIONALITY
    Bronstein (Trotsky) Jew
    Apfelbaum (Zinovief) Jew
    Lourie (Larine) Jew
    Ouritski Jew
    Volodarski Jew
    Rosenfeldt (Kamanef) Jew
    Smidovitch Jew
    Sverdlof (Yankel) Jew
    Nakhamkes (Steklof) Jew
    Ulyanov (Lenin) Russian
    Krylenko Russian
    Lounatcharski Russian

    “The Council of the People’s Commissars comprises the following:

    MINISTRY NAME NATIONALITY
    President Ulyanov (Lenin) Russian
    Foreign Affairs Tchitcherine Russian
    Nationalities Djugashvili (Stalin) Georgian
    Agriculture Protian Armenian
    Economic Council Lourie (Larine) Jew
    Food Schlichter Jew
    Army & Navy Bronstein (Trotsky) Jew
    State Control Lander Jew
    State Lands Kauffman Jew
    Works V. Schmidt Jew
    Social Relief E. Lelina (Knigissen) Jewess
    Public Instruction Lounatcharsky Russian
    Religions Spitzberg Jew
    Interior Apfelbaum (Zinovief) Jew
    Hygiene Anvelt Jew
    Finance Isidore Goukovski Jew
    Press Volodarski Jew
    Elections Ouritski Jew
    Justice I. Steinberg Jew
    Refugees Fenigstein Jew
    Refugees (assist.) Savitch Jew
    Refugees (assist.) Zaslovski Jew

    “The following is the list of members of the Central Executive Committee:

    NAME NATIONALITY
    Sverdlov (president) Jew
    Avanessof (sec.) Armenian
    Bruno Lett
    Babtchinski Jew
    Bukharin Russian
    Weinberg Jew
    Gailiss Jew
    Ganzburg Jew
    Danichevski Jew
    Starck German
    Sachs Jew
    Scheinmann Jew
    Erdling Jew
    Landauer Jew
    Linder Jew
    Wolach Czech
    Dimanstein Jew
    Encukidze Georgian
    Ermann Jew
    Joffe Jew
    Karkline Jew
    Knigissen Jew
    Rosenfeldt (Kamenef) Jew
    Apfelbaum (Zinovief) Jew
    Krylenko Russian
    KrassikofSachs Jew
    Kaprik Jew
    Kaoul Lett
    Ulyanov (lenin) Russian
    Latsis Jew
    Lander Jew
    Lounatcharski Russian
    Peterson Lett
    Peters Lett
    Roudzoutas Jew
    Rosine Jew
    Smidovitch Jew
    Stoutchka Lett
    Nakhamkes (Steklof) Jew
    Sosnovski Jew
    Skrytnik Jew
    Bronstein (Trotsky) Jew
    Teodorovitch Jew
    Terian Armenian
    Ouritski Jew
    Telechkine Russian
    Feldmann Jew
    Froumkine Jew
    Souriupa Ukranian
    Tchavtchevadze Georgian
    Scheikmann Jew
    Rosental Jew
    Achkinazi Imeretian
    Karakhane Karaim (Jew)
    Rose Jew
    Sobelson (Radek) Jew
    Sclichter Jew
    Schikolini Jew
    Chklianski Jew
    Levine (Pravdine) Jew

    “The following is the list of members of the Extraordinary Commission of Moscow:

    NAME NATIONALITY
    Dzerjinski (president) Pole
    Peters (vice-president) Lett
    Chklovski Jew
    Kheifiss Jew
    Zeistine Jew
    Razmirovitch Jew
    Kronberg Jew
    Khaikina Jewess
    Karlson Lett
    Schaumann Jew
    Leontovitch Jew
    Jacob Goldine Jew
    Glaperstein Jew
    Kniggisen Jew
    Latzis Lett
    Schillenkuss Jew
    Janson Lett
    Rivkine Jew
    Antonof Russian
    Delafabre Jew
    Tsitkine Jew
    Roskirovitch Jew
    G. Sverdlof Jew
    Biesenski Jew
    Blioumkine Jew
    Alexandrevitch Russian
    I. Model Jew
    Routenberg Jew
    Pines Jew
    Sachs Jew
    Daybol Lett
    Saissoune Armenian
    Deylkenen Lett
    Liebert Jew
    Vogel German
    Zakiss Lett

    * “We can not state that all Jews are Bolsheviks. But: without Jews there would have been no Bolshevism. For a Jew nothing is more insulting than the truth. The blood maddened Jewish terrorists murdered sixty-six million in Russia from 1918 to 1957. You must understand, the leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. It cannot be overstated. Bolshevism committed the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant and uncaring about this enormous crime is proof that the global media is in the hands of the perpetrators.” – Nobel prize winning author and Champion of human dignity Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, quoted from ‘Gulag Archipelago’

    * “In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.
    There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution, by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews, it is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd) or of Krassin or Radek — all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.” – Winston Churchill, Zionism vs Bolshevism, A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People

    “We must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is racial tensions. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negros. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.” – Rabbi Israel Cohen, A Racial Program for he Twentieth Century, 1912. Also in the Congressional Record, Vol. 103, p. 8559, June 7, 1957

    “Our race is the Master Race. We are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves.” – Menachem Begin, Prime Minister of Israel

    “Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel. Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat… That is why gentiles were created.” – Ovadia Yosef, Chief Rabbi of Orthodox Judaism

    “Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural, and I think we Jews are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies that they once were in the last century. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make, they are now going into multicultural mode, and Jews will be resented because of our leading role, but without that leading role, and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.” – Barbara Lerner Spectre, head of Paideia European Jewish fund and Israeli dual citizen

    “The man of the future will be mixed race, the Eurasian Negroid race of the future will replace the diversity of peoples. Russian Bolshevism constitutes a decisive step towards this purpose where a small group of communist spiritual aristocrats govern the country. The general staff is recruited from Europe’s spiritual leaders and master race, the Jews. From the European quantity of people and masses there will rise up two quality races – the blood aristocracy and their masters the Jews. Both believe in their higher mission of their better blood and race. The superiority of their spirit and race predestines them to be a main factor of the future nobility.” – Richard Von Coudenhove-Kalergi, founder and president of the Pan-European Union, predecessor of the European Union

    “In Israel, death has no dominion over them… With gentiles, it will be like any person – they need to die, but [God] will give them longevity. Why? Imagine that one’s donkey would die, they’d lose their money. This is his servant… That’s why he gets a long life, to work well for this Jew.” – Ovadia Yosef, Chief Rabbi of Orthodox Judaism

    “With the exception of the U.S.S.R. as a federated Eurasian State, all other continents will become united in a world alliance, and there will be an international police force at the disposal of the Jews. All armies will be abolished and there will be no more wars. In Jerusalem, the United Nations will build a shrine of the Jewish prophets, who will be worshiped as Gods, to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents, as prophesied by Isaiah…” – David Ben Gurion, First Prime Minister of Israel, Called the “Greatest Jew of modern times”

    “Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away” – Benjamin Netanyahu, Current Prime Minister of Israel

    * “Some call it Marxism – I call it Judaism.”
    Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, in the American Bulletin of May 15, 1935

    * “The revolution in Russia is a Jewish revolution”
    The Maccabean (New York), Nov. 1905, p, 250

    * “Jewry is the mother of Marxism.”
    Le Droit de Vivre, May 12, 1936

    * “Judaism is Marxism, communism”
    Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York: Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), p. 64

    * “The communist soul is the soul of Judaism.”
    Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York: Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), p. 143

    * “We Jews cannot be called upon to denounce Communism.”
    The American Hebrew (New York), February 3, 1939, p. 11

    * “The picture which the Soviet Union presents today is one that should bring rejoicing to world Jewry.”
    The Youngstown Jewish Times, Sept. 18, 1936, page 51

    * “It would be absurd to deny the intensity of the Jewish participation in the Russian revolutionary movement.”
    Leon Dennen, in The Menorah Journal (New York) July-September 1932, p. 106

    * “That achievement – the Russian-Jewish revolution – destined to figure in history as the overshadowing result of World War, was largely the outcome of Jewish thinking, of Jewish discontent, of Jewish effort to reconstruct.”
    The American Hebrew, September 10, 1920

    * “The Bolshevik Government of Russia is the key-stone of the arch of the proof of the Jewish conspiracy for radicalism and world-domination.”
    William Hard, The Great Jewish Conspiracy (New York: American Jewish Book Company, 1920), p. 31

    * “The Jewish elements provide the driving forces for communism”
    Dr. Oscar Levy, in George Pitt-Rivers, The World Significance of the Russian Revolution (Oxford, 1920), p. ix

    * “The Jews [have been] furnishing for the Bolsheviks the majority of their leaders”
    The Jewish World (London), April 16, 1919, p. 11

    * “Russian Jews have taken a prominent part in the Bolshevist movement”
    The American Hebrew (New York), November 18, 1927, p. 20

    * “Jewry has come to wield a considerable power in the Communist Party.”
    Dr. Avrahm Yarmolinsky, in The Menorah Journal (New York), July 1928, p. 37

    * “The East-Side Jew [Trotsky] that Conquered Europe”
    The liberator (New York), March 1920, pp. 26-27

    * “The real East Sider [New York Jew Trotsky] is at the head of things in Russia.”
    M. L. Larkin, in The Public (New York), November 23, 1918, p. 1433

    * “It is not an accident that Judaism gave birth to Marxism, and it is not an accident that the Jews readily took up Marxism; all this is in perfect accord with the progress of Judaism and the Jews.”
    Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York: Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), p. 148

    * “Karl Marx, who came from an old family of rabbis and brilliant Talmudic scholars, was to point the path of victory for the proletariat.”
    L. Rennap, Anti-Semitism and the Jewish Question (London, 1942), p. 31

    * “Among his [Karl Marx’s] ancestors were Rabbis and Talmudists, men of learning and keen intellect.”
    Henry Wickham Steed, in The American Hebrew (New York), December 9, 1927, p. 206

    * “The peculiarly Jewish logic of his [Karl Marx’s] mind”
    Henry Wickham Steed, in The American Hebrew (New York), December 9, 1927, p. 206

    * “Mr. Wickham Steed lays the rise of Bolshevism at the doors of Jewry.”
    The Jewish Guardian (London), November 28, 1924, p. 4

    * “The Bolshevik Revolution has emancipated the Jews as individuals”
    Dr. Avrahm Yarmolinsky, in The Menorah Journal (New York), July 1928, p. 33

    * “There are many Bolshevik leaders of Jewish extraction”
    D. L. Sandelsan, in The Jewish Chronicle (London), February 20, 1920, p. 22

    * “There is no Jew who does not hope with all his heart that the Soviet Union will survive and be victorious”
    Zionist Review (London: Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland), September 26, 1941, p. 7

    * “Communism and internationalism are in truth and in fact great virtues. Judaism may be justly proud of these virtues”
    Harry Watan, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York: Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), p. 80

    * “If the tide of history does not turn toward Communist internationalism … then the Jewish race is doomed.”
    George Marlen, Stalin, Trotsky, or Lenin (New York, 1937), p. 414

    * “The [Jewish] Commissaries were formerly political exiles. They had been dreaming of revolution for years in their exile in Paris, in London, in New York, in Berlin, everywhere and anywhere. They saw in the Bolshevist Movement an opportunity of realizing the extreme ideas of Communism and internationalism to which their fate had compelled them.”
    Dr. D. S. Pazmanik, in The Jewish Chronicle (London), September 5, 1919, p. 14

    * “The Jewish people will never forget that the Soviet Union was the first country – and as yet the only country in the world – in which anti-Semitism is a crime.”
    Jewish Voice (New York: National Council of Jewish Communists), January 1942, p. 16

    * “Anti-Semitism was classed [by the Soviet Government] as counter-revolution and the severe punishments meted out for acts of anti-Semitism were the means by which the existing order protected its own safety”
    The Congress Bulletin, (New York: American Jewish Congress), January 5, 1940, p. 2

    * “There is no official anti-Semitism in Russia; anti-Semitism in Russia is a crime against the State.”
    Dr. Chalm Weizmann, The Jewish People and Palestine (London: Zionist Organization, 1939), p. 7

    * “Anti-Communism is anti-Semitism.”
    Jewish Voice (New York: National Council of Jewish Communists), July-August 1941, p. 23

    * “The part which Jews play in the [Communist] Government of the country [Russia] does not appear to be declining”
    Harry Sacher, in The Jewish Review (London), June-August 1932, p. 43

    * “The Jews have a right to subordinate to themselves the rest of mankind and to be the masters over the whole earth. This is the historic destiny of the Jews”
    Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), pp. 99-100

    * “We Jews, we the destroyers, will remain the destroyers forever. Nothing that you will do, will meet our needs and demands. We will destroy because we need a world of our own.”
    Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, page 155

    * “The Russian intelligentsia . . . saw in the philosophy of Judaism the germs of Bolshevism – the struggle of … Judaism versus Christianity.”
    Leon Dennen, in The Menorah Journal (New York, July-September 1932, p. 105

    * “Soviet Russia has declared war on Christianity, and on those who profess this faith. In the Russian villages today Bolsheviks and Herbert H. Lehman . . . were called the ‘secret government of the United States’ and were linked with ‘world communism.’”
    Dr. Louis Harap, in Jewish Life (New York), June 1951, p. 20

  14. Classical Liberal Warrior 15 August, 2017 at 14:40 Reply

    Right-wing conservatism and left-wing progressivism are fatuous and depraved ideologies. The future belongs to libertarianism, capitalism, and PURE FREEDOM. The alt-right is the total CUCK version of political liberty.

  15. Augur Mayson 15 August, 2017 at 13:20 Reply

    The only reason Jews have to go on and on about Nazis as they do forever is to stop people thinking rationally about the Nazis and taking a look at racial “science” as developed by the Germans, their defining of Jews by blood, as an ethnic group, a hostile one, the most hostile of all. Nazis did a lot right. If we’d all become Nazis 70 years ago instead of kicking the sh!t out of them for Jewry we wouldn’t be under Jewish rule today and listening to Jewish media, fighting Jewish wars, watching Jewish entertainment, and listening to pro-Jew, pro-Israel propaganda from our government. It is viewed by many in the right as our greatest weakness, The Swastika. And Hitler, viewed similarly by some. However you should strive to recognize that the reason for all the negative propaganda daily about Hitler and the Swasitka and the Nazis is because it’s actually the Jews’ Achilles’ Heel. That’s why they can’t have people talking honestly and thinking rationally about it. See, they’ve even conditioned many of you so deeply you don’t recognize you still cling to Jew programming.

    Solution: all of us become avowed outspoken and effective Holocaust Deniers. Seriously.

    • ahermit 15 August, 2017 at 16:59 Reply

      The only thing you got right there was putting “science” in quotation marks. Nazi racism relied on biased, poorly designed pseudo-scientific nonsense.

      • Augur Mayson 15 August, 2017 at 17:18 Reply

        Oh so you deny that the German National Socialists were right about Jewishness being a bloodborne condition? That’s how you define yourself, with proven ancestry and clusters of Jewish haplogroups. That’s why the Black African beta-Israelis are Jews, because they are related to you.

        You can differ about phrenology, I put it in quotes because I look at that as just a subsection of anthropology, one the Jews shun investigation of because study of skulls, of bones in general, shows the races aren’t the same and did long before the storage of information in DNA was figured out. That’s why you make sure to mock it because it shows that you’re different, that you’re a different ethnic group, a different race. The science is no more iron-clad than other soft science but with the benefit of modern DNA analysis I think racial studies could take on a whole new meaning at universities once we are running things.

        Also, evenin’, other Jew.

      • Captain John Charity Spring MA 15 August, 2017 at 18:00 Reply

        They only needed DNA to be discovered in the 1930s and they were off to the bank.

        It’s similar with the Confederates. Knocked out just before Darwin overturned the creation myth.

  16. Stormer 15 August, 2017 at 13:01 Reply

    Nationalism is and always has been considered right-wing. Who are they fooling?

    Except in North Korea, China, USSSR etc.

    These protestors aren’t on the right! They’re actually lefties!”

    Right, that’s why they are attacked by extreme left.

  17. ahermit 15 August, 2017 at 11:42 Reply

    I’m a proud white man. Which means I don’t have to whine and cry about the Jews or other people or prance around in silly neo-Nazi cosplay marches to feel good about myself.

    You alt-right boys are pathetic bed-wetting little whiners and an embarrassment to real men and white people everywhere.

    • Cuckblocker 15 August, 2017 at 11:46 Reply

      We’re not whining, we’re building up awareness so that we may bring a full physical force into action and literally destroy them. And we’re doing a pretty damn good job so far so get ready.

      • ahermit 15 August, 2017 at 12:10 Reply

        You’re whining. Blubbering like frightened spoiled little children, spouting moronic paranoid conspiracy theories and the outdated propaganda of the 1930’s. It’s pathetic.

        • KiddBlast 15 August, 2017 at 12:15 Reply

          If you think there’s no problem, you’re part of the problem.

          If you’ve got a better solution, bring it.

          • ahermit 15 August, 2017 at 12:21

            The solution is to grow up, take responsibility for your own life, stop whining and moaning and treat people with respect regardless of their race or ethnicity.

            Strutting around like wannabe Nazis won’t solve anything. Just makes you look like idiots.

          • ahermit 15 August, 2017 at 12:29

            I think you’re a pack of paranoid bedwetting posers, that’s what I think.

            Career and family aside you’re acting like a frightened little child if you’re swallowing the conspiracy theories and paranoid nonsense being offered up by these neo-Nazi pretenders, so yes you need to grow up.

          • ahermit 15 August, 2017 at 12:45

            LMFAO… “Shlomo?”

            Seriously? Your best shot is to haul out some lame anti-Semitic dog whistle?

            Just as a matter of interest, there’s only one “ö” in my real name, and it traditionally has an Umlaut over it you fucking moron. I’m as pure white Aryan as it gets and you stupid posers are an embarrassment to my European heritage, representing as you do all of the worst and none of the best parts of that heritage.

          • KiddBlast 15 August, 2017 at 13:01

            Ach, nein! Du hast einen Umlaut in Deinem Namen. Ich bin schwer beeindruckt. Steht wohl für depperte Tröte.

            You come in here claiming your a “proud white man”. More like a proud commie ratfucker who gives a flying fuck about his “European heritage”.

            I’m %100 Deutsch, pal. I’ll out-Aryan you any day – in German or in English. Take you pick.

            You must not read the newspapers, otherwise you’d know what’s happening to your “European heritage” – about the legions of people in Germany, Austria and Scandinavia, mostly women and children, who get assaulted, murdered and raped every day by third-world invaders. That’s the same thing you want for the US apparently.

            Well I’ve got news for you: you’re not going to get it as long as were around, so don’t get your hopes up.

          • ahermit 15 August, 2017 at 15:11

            Hysterical bed-wetting nonsense; white crime victims are almost always victimized by other whites, same for other groups. Crime rates are actually way down from where they were when I was younger.

            You’re jumping at shadows, letting yourself be led by fear of the Bogeyman. What a pathetic sight you are.

          • ahermit 15 August, 2017 at 16:37

            No, that’s not a label I have ever attached to myself.

            Do you self-identify as a cowardly bed-wetting half-wit?

          • KiddBlast 16 August, 2017 at 07:54

            Sure, Shlomo.

            For you the evil Nazi is the Bogeyman and blacks are beyond reproach.

            Same goes for the invaders who are culturally enriching Europe at the moment.

          • ahermit 16 August, 2017 at 13:41

            Nobody is turning our country into Mogadishu you bedwetter. Except maybe the neanderthal Nazis and white supremacists with their silly Tiki torches abd their ignorant fearful propaganda.

          • KiddBlast 16 August, 2017 at 15:28

            U R a persistent ki ke, I’ll give you that.

            Baltimore, Detroit, LA Compton, NOLA and St. Louis are our versions of Mogadishu. The violent crime rate in all of them is well over 1,500 per 100,000 (Detroit is well over 2,000). If you immigration Jews keep working on it, maybe we can break 3,000.

          • ahermit 16 August, 2017 at 18:02

            Violent crime is a fraction of what it was three decades ago when I was young..er.

            Your ‘statistics’ are misleading propaganda bullshit and you are a whimpering cowardly bedwetting racist moron.

          • KiddBlast 16 August, 2017 at 19:40

            End of the line, Shlomo.

            heyjackass.com the THE up-to-date site on Chicago crime.

            You can’t refute those statistics, you commie punk f*aggot.

          • KiddBlast 18 August, 2017 at 07:53

            I’m totally stoked!

            Maybe in ten years violent crime in the US will cease to exist and I can buy real estate in Detroit.

            Not that it would make any difference to your people, safely ensconced in their West Palm Beach and Upper East Side high rises equipped with doormen and private security guards.

            The only time they have to leave their buildings is to attend Jews for Immigration or ADL meetings. They even have their bagels delivered fresh every morning in six different flavors.

            But hey, Shlo, congrats on breaking that 3,000 per 100,000 violent crime hurdle. I did a little research of my own and it turns out that the BIG cities are trailing the outlying areas. The current leader in pure vc numbers in Florida City, with a whopping 31.56 violent crimes per 1000.

            You did it!!!

            Emeryville, CA gets honorable mention for the highest property crime stats, with 172.92 per 1,000, so nearly 1 person out of 5 gets ripped off or burglarized there annually.

            The country’s definitely on the mend.

            We have reason to be optimistic 🙂

            https://www.safewise.com/blog/most-dangerous-cities/

          • ahermit 18 August, 2017 at 08:15

            Cherry picking outliers doesn’t disprove the overall trend you fucking halfwit. Crime of all linds is decreasing so wetting your pants over it is just stupid.

            The rest if that comnent tells me you’ve lost your tinfoil hat again. Maybe this will help…

            http://zapatopi.net/afdb/build.html

            Remember….shiny side out!

          • ahermit 19 August, 2017 at 22:38

            Is that supposed to mean something? Besides proving once again that you’re an ignorant little child?

          • KiddBlast 20 August, 2017 at 14:56

            They’re coming for you, you twat.
            ‘Proud white ma man’ my ass. You sound like a liberal Jew woman. You’ll find out the hard way. Just keep believing what you belive.

          • ahermit 20 August, 2017 at 15:44

            LOL. Unlike you I’m not a bedwetting little boy who shits his pants at the thought that things might not always be like some ridiculous 1950’s “father Knows Best” fantasy world which never really exsted anyway.

            You Nazis are such fucking cowards. Sad, weak frightened little crybabies jumping at shadows.

          • KiddBlast 20 August, 2017 at 20:25

            You could give a shit about the direction in which the country is headed.

            You’re not interested in violent crime at present levels, but criminals won’t stop being interested in you.

            Do you own a gun? If you do and you even have to use it, chances are you won’t be using it against a White person.

            Stay in the suburbs where you’re safe. At least Ben Carson has stopped the Section 8 madness.

            It’s all a joke for you. You rattle off your tired, rehearsed liberal boilerplate.

            Until the shadows become real.

            And they are, otherwise you people wouldn’t be so unhinged right now.

            If you think so-called “Nazis” or Whites in general – except White liberals and their policies – are too blame for any of this, think again.

            Father knows best.

          • ahermit 21 August, 2017 at 09:28

            I am concerned that the country is taking a turn which allows Nazis to march openly and proudly in the streets of an American city.

            Violent crime is at a thirty year low; yes it’s still bad when it happens but it’s not the epidemic you want to pretend it is.

            No I don’t own a gun becasue I’m not a bedwetting coward who walks around shaking in fear of the bogeyman.

            I don’t and have never lived in the suburbs, I have lived in cities and currently I live on the prairies. I am not the stereotype that lives in your sick little mind.

            You on the other hand are a weak, stupid, frightened little cowardly sack of shit. You and your Nazi friends deserve nothing but contempt.

          • KiddBlast 21 August, 2017 at 15:52

            So, in your opinion, if the so-called “Nazis” – which made up a minority of the demonstrators at C-Ville – should be forbidden from exercizing their 1st Amendment rights that would make you an anti-Constitutionalist and a totalitarian.

            No surprises there.

            Strongly suggest you replenish your catalogue of insults, which is very repetitive and boring.

            YOU are boring.

            Time waing for you and your ilk.

            Best,

            Kidd

          • ahermit 21 August, 2017 at 16:05

            So, in your opinion, if the so-called “Nazis” – which made up a minority
            of the demonstrators at C-Ville – should be forbidden from exercizing
            their 1st Amendment rights that would make you an anti-Constitutionalist
            and a totalitarian.

            First of all the Nazis were not a minority of those marching in Charlottesville. All of those demonstrators were Nazis or Nazi sympathizers. Anyone happily marching in support of people waving Nazi flags and chanting Nazi slogans is at least a sympathizer.

            And second, I never said they didn’t have a right to express their ignorant bigoted moronic opinions you fucking half-wit. Once again you are substituting the voices in your head for reality. They had every right to march and shout their silly slogans and I have never said otherwise.

            On the other hand, the counter-demonstrators had a right to exercise their First Amendment right to point out the stupidity ignorance and moronic bigotry of the Nazis without those chickenshit Nazis attacking them with clubs and running them down with a car…

        • ahermit 15 August, 2017 at 17:04 Reply

          What’s the matter sonny? Truth hurts? You’re too weak and cowardly to listen to contrary opinion? Thinking is too hard for you?

          Sorry to disrupt your happy little circle-jerk you sad little whiner.

    • KiddBlast 15 August, 2017 at 12:10 Reply

      And what are “real men” and most white people doing to raise awareness of the fact that their people are being systematically dispossessed and robbed of their birthright and not just in the US? This is a global trend.

      I’d agree with you that carrying a Nazi flag in public is totally counterproductive. I’d also agree that being a proud, self-possessed white man is a great thing. But just feeling good about yourself is not a solution – we have to get the word out that we’re entitled to advocate for our people the same way La Raza or the NAACP are; if that only sinks in the day Texas becomes a blue state, you’ve missed the starting gun and it’s too late.

      • ahermit 15 August, 2017 at 12:16 Reply

        Paranoid bullshit. I’m sorry, I’m just not impressed by this bedwetting nonsense about white people being “dispossessed.” Seeing people with darker skin than mine doing well in life doesn’t threaten me at all; in fact I celebrate their success and welcome them as my neighbours, as we all should.

        You guys are nothing but a pack of whiny little cowards without enough self respect to make something of yourselves, so you have to attack others and pretend that your failures are somehow their fault. Those of us who have actually worked to succeed should have nothing but contempt for crybaby losers like the alt-right.

        • KiddBlast 15 August, 2017 at 12:21 Reply

          So how many more straw men and cliches’ do you want to roll out today for our entertainment?

          I’ve long since made something of myself – that’s not the issue here.

          Who says everyone on the alt-right is a failure?

          If you don’t grasp the fact that there’s a systematic effort afoot to turn Texas blue, for example, you’re living in a dream world.

          And I suppose you’re down with unlimited immigration from Somalia and god knows what other third-world Muslim hellholes? All of ’em living on our dime, just like most of the illegals who are already here?

          Stop being smug to point of ignorance.

          Or admit you’re a shill who just came here to fuck with us.

          • ahermit 15 August, 2017 at 12:34

            So what is the problem exactly, that there are people in the world who don’t look like you and me?

            And talk about straw men; all this whimpering about immigration and refugees is pathetic. There are certainly challenges involved, but no more than there has been in the past when the Irish and the Italians and my own Dutch/German ancestors emigrated to North America. Most of the immigrants and refugees I’ve ever met are the hardest working people I’ve ever seen. they know how good it is here and they work their asses off to be part of it.

            You’re nothing but a coward and a liar.

          • KiddBlast 15 August, 2017 at 12:48

            People “who don’t look like you and me” are fine, as long as they don’t take over our culture and turn it into something it was never meant to be, which is exactly what they’re doing.

            Irish? Italians? It’s not like they belonged to our cultural heritage as Christians or anything… Gimmie’ a break.

            Do yourself a favor and look up the Hart-Celler Act and realize what’s happened to US immigration since 1965.

            Your anecdote about hard working immigrants is fine – I’ve seen such people myself – but it’s an anecdote and nothing more. Like most of the crap leftists like yourself claim about immigration, it doesn’t scale up. Fact is people are scamming our immigration system to the tune of about $55 billion a year.

            >>There are approximately 3.7 million unlawful immigrant households in the U.S. These households impose a net fiscal burden of around $54.5 billion per year.<<

            And as a taxpayer, I'm SICK of it!

            Calling me a coward and a liar won't change the facts.

            http://www.heritage.org/immigration/report/the-fiscal-cost-unlawful-immigrants-and-amnesty-the-us-taxpayer

          • ahermit 15 August, 2017 at 15:18

            Culture is constantly changing (thank goodness; I’d hate to live in a world of repressed Victorian culture…) and all the whining you are doing is no different from the whining that previous generations of bedwetters produced in reaction to the Irish, the Italians, the Poles, Japanese, Chinese and Vietnamese immigrants and refugees in the past. They didn’t look like us, they didn’t speak English, they followed some “funny” unfamiliar religion…there’s nothing new in your tired old rhetoric.

            The economic benefits of immigration, including illegal immigration, far outweigh the costs. This is an argument for easing the restrictions, not imposing more, as allowing immigrants already in the country to come out of the shadows would benefit everyone.

            https://www.cfr.org/report/economic-logic-illegal-immigration

            http://www.cornellrooseveltinstitute.org/the-unseen-economics-of-illegal-immigration.html

            Those are the facts.

    • Patriotic American 15 August, 2017 at 14:26 Reply

      Yeah, so proud, that is why you don’t do anything when communists openly brag that they plan to exterminate us and erase our history. Cuck.

      • ahermit 15 August, 2017 at 15:02 Reply

        I’m proud to not be a bedwetting little baby who cries and whines and takes stupid conspiracy theories like that one seriously…

        • Vincent Law 15 August, 2017 at 15:41 Reply

          is it a conspiracy that there are less and less Whites relative to non-Whites in White countries every year you fat soy-munching retard?

          • ahermit 15 August, 2017 at 16:15

            It’s a demographic observation. So what? If my grandchildren have browner skin than me, is that supposed to be a problem?

          • Captain John Charity Spring MA 15 August, 2017 at 18:05

            Well yeah if you want to have functioning air conditioning, working transportation, heavy lifting moving and digging equipment, safe buildings, planes that don’t fall out the sky etc etc.

        • Patriotic American 15 August, 2017 at 17:03 Reply

          Conspiracy, you say? LOL

          Soviet Government (1919): Summary

          Bureaucracy……………..Total number………….Jews
          Peoples Commissaries……………22……………………….17
          Provincial Commissaries……… 23……………………….21
          Commissariat of War………… 43……………………….33
          Foreign Affairs………………………16……………………….13
          Finance…………………………………30………………………24
          Justice…………………………………. 21……………………….20
          Public Instruction…………………..53………………………42
          Social Assistance……………………..6………………………..6
          Labour……………………………………8………………………..7

          Total number of Bolshevist Government officials in 1919 : 545
          Total number of JEWS in Bolshevist Government in 1919: 447

          NAME NATIONALITY
          Bronstein (Trotsky) Jew
          Apfelbaum (Zinovief) Jew
          Lourie (Larine) Jew
          Ouritski Jew
          Volodarski Jew
          Rosenfeldt (Kamanef) Jew
          Smidovitch Jew
          Sverdlof (Yankel) Jew
          Nakhamkes (Steklof) Jew
          Ulyanov (Lenin) Russian
          Krylenko Russian
          Lounatcharski Russian

          The Council of the People’s Commissars comprises the following:

          MINISTRY NAME NATIONALITY
          President Ulyanov (Lenin) Russian
          Foreign Affairs Tchitcherine Russian
          Nationalities Djugashvili (Stalin) Georgian
          Agriculture Protian Armenian
          Economic Council Lourie (Larine) Jew
          Food Schlichter Jew
          Army & Navy Bronstein (Trotsky) Jew
          State Control Lander Jew
          State Lands Kauffman Jew
          Works V. Schmidt Jew
          Social Relief E. Lelina (Knigissen) Jewess
          Public Instruction Lounatcharsky Russian
          Religions Spitzberg Jew
          Interior Apfelbaum (Zinovief) Jew
          Hygiene Anvelt Jew
          Finance Isidore Goukovski Jew
          Press Volodarski Jew
          Elections Ouritski Jew
          Justice I. Steinberg Jew
          Refugees Fenigstein Jew
          Refugees (assist.) Savitch Jew
          Refugees (assist.) Zaslovski Jew

          The following is the list of members of the Central Executive Committee:

          NAME NATIONALITY
          Sverdlov (president) Jew
          Avanessof (sec.) Armenian
          Bruno Lett
          Babtchinski Jew
          Bukharin Russian
          Weinberg Jew
          Gailiss Jew
          Ganzburg Jew
          Danichevski Jew
          Starck German
          Sachs Jew
          Scheinmann Jew
          Erdling Jew
          Landauer Jew
          Linder Jew
          Wolach Czech
          Dimanstein Jew
          Encukidze Georgian
          Ermann Jew
          Joffe Jew
          Karkline Jew
          Knigissen Jew
          Rosenfeldt (Kamenef) Jew
          Apfelbaum (Zinovief) Jew
          Krylenko Russian
          KrassikofSachs Jew
          Kaprik Jew
          Kaoul Lett
          Ulyanov (lenin) Russian
          Latsis Jew
          Lander Jew
          Lounatcharski Russian
          Peterson Lett
          Peters Lett
          Roudzoutas Jew
          Rosine Jew
          Smidovitch Jew
          Stoutchka Lett
          Nakhamkes (Steklof) Jew
          Sosnovski Jew
          Skrytnik Jew
          Bronstein (Trotsky) Jew
          Teodorovitch Jew
          Terian Armenian
          Ouritski Jew
          Telechkine Russian
          Feldmann Jew
          Froumkine Jew
          Souriupa Ukranian
          Tchavtchevadze Georgian
          Scheikmann Jew
          Rosental Jew
          Achkinazi Imeretian
          Karakhane Karaim (Jew)
          Rose Jew
          Sobelson (Radek) Jew
          Sclichter Jew
          Schikolini Jew
          Chklianski Jew
          Levine (Pravdine) Jew

          The following is the list of members of the Extraordinary Commission of Moscow:

          NAME NATIONALITY
          Dzerjinski (president) Pole
          Peters (vice-president) Lett
          Chklovski Jew
          Kheifiss Jew
          Zeistine Jew
          Razmirovitch Jew
          Kronberg Jew
          Khaikina Jewess
          Karlson Lett
          Schaumann Jew
          Leontovitch Jew
          Jacob Goldine Jew
          Glaperstein Jew
          Kniggisen Jew
          Latzis Lett
          Schillenkuss Jew
          Janson Lett
          Rivkine Jew
          Antonof Russian
          Delafabre Jew
          Tsitkine Jew
          Roskirovitch Jew
          G. Sverdlof Jew
          Biesenski Jew
          Blioumkine Jew
          Alexandrevitch Russian
          I. Model Jew
          Routenberg Jew
          Pines Jew
          Sachs Jew
          Daybol Lett
          Saissoune Armenian
          Deylkenen Lett
          Liebert Jew
          Vogel German
          Zakiss Lett

          * “We can not state that all Jews are Bolsheviks. But: without Jews there would have been no Bolshevism. For a Jew nothing is more insulting than the truth. The blood maddened Jewish terrorists murdered sixty-six million in Russia from 1918 to 1957. You must understand, the leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. It cannot be overstated. Bolshevism committed the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant and uncaring about this enormous crime is proof that the global media is in the hands of the perpetrators.” – Nobel prize winning author and Champion of human dignity Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, quoted from ‘Gulag Archipelago’

          * “In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.
          There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution, by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews, it is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd) or of Krassin or Radek — all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.” – Winston Churchill, Zionism vs Bolshevism, A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People

          “We must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is racial tensions. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negros. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.” – Rabbi Israel Cohen, A Racial Program for he Twentieth Century, 1912. Also in the Congressional Record, Vol. 103, p. 8559, June 7, 1957

          “Our race is the Master Race. We are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves.” – Menachem Begin, Prime Minister of Israel

          “Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel. Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat… That is why gentiles were created.” – Ovadia Yosef, Chief Rabbi of Orthodox Judaism

          “Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural, and I think we Jews are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies that they once were in the last century. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make, they are now going into multicultural mode, and Jews will be resented because of our leading role, but without that leading role, and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.” – Barbara Lerner Spectre, head of Paideia European Jewish fund and Israeli dual citizen

          “The man of the future will be mixed race, the Eurasian Negroid race of the future will replace the diversity of peoples. Russian Bolshevism constitutes a decisive step towards this purpose where a small group of communist spiritual aristocrats govern the country. The general staff is recruited from Europe’s spiritual leaders and master race, the Jews. From the European quantity of people and masses there will rise up two quality races – the blood aristocracy and their masters the Jews. Both believe in their higher mission of their better blood and race. The superiority of their spirit and race predestines them to be a main factor of the future nobility.” – Richard Von Coudenhove-Kalergi, founder and president of the Pan-European Union, predecessor of the European Union

          “In Israel, death has no dominion over them… With gentiles, it will be like any person – they need to die, but [God] will give them longevity. Why? Imagine that one’s donkey would die, they’d lose their money. This is his servant… That’s why he gets a long life, to work well for this Jew.” – Ovadia Yosef, Chief Rabbi of Orthodox Judaism

          “With the exception of the U.S.S.R. as a federated Eurasian State, all other continents will become united in a world alliance, and there will be an international police force at the disposal of the Jews. All armies will be abolished and there will be no more wars. In Jerusalem, the United Nations will build a shrine of the Jewish prophets, who will be worshiped as Gods, to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents, as prophesied by Isaiah…” – David Ben Gurion, First Prime Minister of Israel, Called the “Greatest Jew of modern times”

          “Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away” – Benjamin Netanyahu, Current Prime Minister of Israel

          * “Some call it Marxism – I call it Judaism.”
          Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, in the American Bulletin of May 15, 1935

          * “The revolution in Russia is a Jewish revolution”
          The Maccabean (New York), Nov. 1905, p, 250

          * “Jewry is the mother of Marxism.”
          Le Droit de Vivre, May 12, 1936

          * “Judaism is Marxism, communism”
          Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York: Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), p. 64

          * “The communist soul is the soul of Judaism.”
          Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York: Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), p. 143

          * “We Jews cannot be called upon to denounce Communism.”
          The American Hebrew (New York), February 3, 1939, p. 11

          * “The picture which the Soviet Union presents today is one that should bring rejoicing to world Jewry.”
          The Youngstown Jewish Times, Sept. 18, 1936, page 51

          * “It would be absurd to deny the intensity of the Jewish participation in the Russian revolutionary movement.”
          Leon Dennen, in The Menorah Journal (New York) July-September 1932, p. 106

          * “That achievement – the Russian-Jewish revolution – destined to figure in history as the overshadowing result of World War, was largely the outcome of Jewish thinking, of Jewish discontent, of Jewish effort to reconstruct.”
          The American Hebrew, September 10, 1920

          * “The Bolshevik Government of Russia is the key-stone of the arch of the proof of the Jewish conspiracy for radicalism and world-domination.”
          William Hard, The Great Jewish Conspiracy (New York: American Jewish Book Company, 1920), p. 31

          * “The Jewish elements provide the driving forces for communism”
          Dr. Oscar Levy, in George Pitt-Rivers, The World Significance of the Russian Revolution (Oxford, 1920), p. ix

          * “The Jews [have been] furnishing for the Bolsheviks the majority of their leaders”
          The Jewish World (London), April 16, 1919, p. 11

          * “Russian Jews have taken a prominent part in the Bolshevist movement”
          The American Hebrew (New York), November 18, 1927, p. 20

          * “Jewry has come to wield a considerable power in the Communist Party.”
          Dr. Avrahm Yarmolinsky, in The Menorah Journal (New York), July 1928, p. 37

          * “The East-Side Jew [Trotsky] that Conquered Europe”
          The liberator (New York), March 1920, pp. 26-27

          * “The real East Sider [New York Jew Trotsky] is at the head of things in Russia.”
          M. L. Larkin, in The Public (New York), November 23, 1918, p. 1433

          * “It is not an accident that Judaism gave birth to Marxism, and it is not an accident that the Jews readily took up Marxism; all this is in perfect accord with the progress of Judaism and the Jews.”
          Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York: Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), p. 148

          * “Karl Marx, who came from an old family of rabbis and brilliant Talmudic scholars, was to point the path of victory for the proletariat.”
          L. Rennap, Anti-Semitism and the Jewish Question (London, 1942), p. 31

          * “Among his [Karl Marx’s] ancestors were Rabbis and Talmudists, men of learning and keen intellect.”
          Henry Wickham Steed, in The American Hebrew (New York), December 9, 1927, p. 206

          * “The peculiarly Jewish logic of his [Karl Marx’s] mind”
          Henry Wickham Steed, in The American Hebrew (New York), December 9, 1927, p. 206

          * “Mr. Wickham Steed lays the rise of Bolshevism at the doors of Jewry.”
          The Jewish Guardian (London), November 28, 1924, p. 4

          * “The Bolshevik Revolution has emancipated the Jews as individuals”
          Dr. Avrahm Yarmolinsky, in The Menorah Journal (New York), July 1928, p. 33

          * “There are many Bolshevik leaders of Jewish extraction”
          D. L. Sandelsan, in The Jewish Chronicle (London), February 20, 1920, p. 22

          * “There is no Jew who does not hope with all his heart that the Soviet Union will survive and be victorious”
          Zionist Review (London: Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland), September 26, 1941, p. 7

          * “Communism and internationalism are in truth and in fact great virtues. Judaism may be justly proud of these virtues”
          Harry Watan, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York: Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), p. 80

          * “If the tide of history does not turn toward Communist internationalism … then the Jewish race is doomed.”
          George Marlen, Stalin, Trotsky, or Lenin (New York, 1937), p. 414

          * “The [Jewish] Commissaries were formerly political exiles. They had been dreaming of revolution for years in their exile in Paris, in London, in New York, in Berlin, everywhere and anywhere. They saw in the Bolshevist Movement an opportunity of realizing the extreme ideas of Communism and internationalism to which their fate had compelled them.”
          Dr. D. S. Pazmanik, in The Jewish Chronicle (London), September 5, 1919, p. 14

          * “The Jewish people will never forget that the Soviet Union was the first country – and as yet the only country in the world – in which anti-Semitism is a crime.”
          Jewish Voice (New York: National Council of Jewish Communists), January 1942, p. 16

          * “Anti-Semitism was classed [by the Soviet Government] as counter-revolution and the severe punishments meted out for acts of anti-Semitism were the means by which the existing order protected its own safety”
          The Congress Bulletin, (New York: American Jewish Congress), January 5, 1940, p. 2

          * “There is no official anti-Semitism in Russia; anti-Semitism in Russia is a crime against the State.”
          Dr. Chalm Weizmann, The Jewish People and Palestine (London: Zionist Organization, 1939), p. 7

          * “Anti-Communism is anti-Semitism.”
          Jewish Voice (New York: National Council of Jewish Communists), July-August 1941, p. 23

          * “The part which Jews play in the [Communist] Government of the country [Russia] does not appear to be declining”
          Harry Sacher, in The Jewish Review (London), June-August 1932, p. 43

          * “The Jews have a right to subordinate to themselves the rest of mankind and to be the masters over the whole earth. This is the historic destiny of the Jews”
          Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), pp. 99-100

          * “We Jews, we the destroyers, will remain the destroyers forever. Nothing that you will do, will meet our needs and demands. We will destroy because we need a world of our own.”
          Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, page 155

          * “The Russian intelligentsia . . . saw in the philosophy of Judaism the germs of Bolshevism – the struggle of … Judaism versus Christianity.”
          Leon Dennen, in The Menorah Journal (New York, July-September 1932, p. 105

          * “Soviet Russia has declared war on Christianity, and on those who profess this faith. In the Russian villages today Bolsheviks and Herbert H. Lehman . . . were called the ‘secret government of the United States’ and were linked with ‘world communism.’”
          Dr. Louis Harap, in Jewish Life (New York), June 1951, p. 20

          • ahermit 15 August, 2017 at 17:41

            Wow. that’s an impressive list of made up “statistics” and carefully curated quotes. Where did you cut and paste that bit of ancient propaganda from? Did you notice that it completely ignores the long subsequent history of Soviet anti-Semitism?

            http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/russia-virtual-jewish-history-tour#8

            http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=130936993

            And why in the 21st century , a quarter of a century after the fall of the Soviet Union, should I give a shit that some Bolsheviks in 1919 had “Jewish sounding” names?

            Fucking bedwetter idiot.

          • Patriotic American 15 August, 2017 at 17:53

            You sound triggered, judlein. You going to cry 6 gorillion tears? Well, that is just too bad. Go and do it somewhere else, I’m sure Rabbi Kikestein has some tissues for you over at the yeshiva, you filthy rat.

          • ahermit 15 August, 2017 at 17:55

            ROTFLMAO!

            You think I’m Jewish?

            BWAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

            You fucking Nazi moron.

            You and your little “alt-right” poser friends are a laughing stock after this weekend. it’s the beginning of the end for your sad little “movement.”

    • KiddBlast 15 August, 2017 at 11:58 Reply

      …or just continue on with their narrow focus on secondary issues and “civility” in politics, which ultimately amounts to joining the left.

      There’s an old adage that says something like “The most dangerous political factions are those in the middle.”

      History if rife with examples of centrist groups facilitating the rise of leftist dictatorships.

      The cuck pays plenty of lip service to “muh conservative principles”, and in the end he’s not willing to abandon them, even if abandonment means losing his remaining freedoms. We saw that clearly enough in the 2016 election cycle.

      There are still legions of voters out there who would love to see a globalist shill POTUS like Jeb or Marco Rubio.

  18. Crud Bonemeal 15 August, 2017 at 10:50 Reply

    I had the amusing experience of having a Moly-tier but in denial boomer conservative give me an account of the Charlottesville event that was…

    Actually misleading in terms of how favorable it was to the rallygoers, protraying them as “almost all Patriot types”. But otherwise getting the facts basically correct, that the government was to blame.

    It’s just an anecdotal piece of evidence, but polarization may be at a point where non-famous conservative people are very reluctant to side with CNN and Terry Mcaullife.

    I do think that if we LARP as Americans a little bit, hide our power level a little bit and just frame our views as nationalism instead of national socialism they basically won’t oppose us for now.

    • Solo et Sanguis 15 August, 2017 at 11:12 Reply

      I’ve enjoyed the posts I’ve seen of yours on here, and I do want to ask, why include the socialism? I’ve been taught that socialism is a Jewish evil imposed on the West to destroy our societies by other so-called “white nationalists”. I am proudly nationalist myself, but I do not support socialism as an economic or governmental system personally. I dislike the idea that the government (even if it were entirely run by my people) should have any say in what I can do with my labor or wealth.

      I’m fine with more voluntary structures, certainly. A return to the community and church (not the modern church certainly) as the focal point of our daily lives, and who we can turn to for help and support during times of need. That sort of communitarianism I am strongly in favor of because I feel that without it, we have bred the sort of world we see today where whites have been easily divided and cowed to oppose their own interests.

      So again, I am just curious and sincerely asking, why the socialism part with the nationalism?

      Thanks!

      • Vincent Law 15 August, 2017 at 11:24 Reply

        You really need to reconsider everything you’ve been taught.

        Capitalism has created many of the problems we face. We all become interchangeable cogs, to replace for lower cost paki cogs in the near future. The only thing that matters is profit, money, “greed is good”, and screw everyone else because its ‘dog eat dog’ and survival of the fittest and savage intra-ethnic competition for shekels is somehow good.

        Many of us who are ‘socialist’ do so to critique this blind subservience to GDP, to the Dow, to money above blood and soil

        • Solo et Sanguis 15 August, 2017 at 11:36 Reply

          Well those evils are more correctly attributable to systems where the government and the businesses collude closely together, as was actually the case in Nazi Germany. When politically well connected businesses have a senator or two under their thumb, or even a president, it makes it very easy to get legislation favorable to your profits – such as unfettered immigration to drive down wages and anti-competitive legislation to maintain your monopoly.

          In a free market system, which America is not and hasn’t been for well over a century now, that would not happen. If a company is unable to compete on an equal playing field, they fail – no bailouts, not subsidies, no favorable legislation – you either survive, or you die. Survival of the fittest applied to the business world.

          I get the critique of capitalism in it’s present form, I’ve heard it enough from the Occupy Wall Street and Bernie Bro types over the last decade. But that still doesn’t answer WHY socialism? Socialism won’t solve that in the least. You will still have certain industries favored by the government getting special advantages for their own benefit to the detriment of those who they employ and consumers as a whole. One need only look to places like Venezuela, North Korea, or the former USSR to see what happens when you have the government deciding for the market what should and should not be produced and who should and should not receive that produce.

          I don’t feel like standing in bread lines, or having only one type of shoe I can buy (assuming they aren’t sold out of course).

          I’ll play Devil’s Advocate with you and you tell me which part is incorrect:

          IF the assumption is, that a socialistic system run by and for Whites will not have those problems (is that the assumption we are working from here?) then how does such a system prevent waste, corruption, or inefficiency? Is it because you assume that all the whites in control of the means of production will work altruistically for the benefit of their people? Do you assume they will withhold or contain their instinct toward self interest? On what is this assumption based? Will a white run socialistic system be the only system to successfully defeat human nature once and for all?

          Therein lies my criticism of socialism in whatever form, even if it were run by and for Whites – I don’t believe it can destroy several million years of human nature and somehow create a Volk that will be entirely and purely altruistic toward their Nation and People rather than their own self interests. Even Germany failed to accomplish that under the previous Nazi regime, there was plenty of fraud, waste, and inefficiency throughout that system – with Hitler greatly to blame for creating a system with so many redundancies and chains of command that you often had several different government agencies working on the same issues but working against one another to maintain favor with Hitler and back stab the other ones.

          • Vincent Law 15 August, 2017 at 11:49

            Germany was incredibly successful under NS. As were all the Continental countries in Europe that functionally adopted socialism after the war to get their economies up and running.

            The idea that its actually de gubmint that corrupts the free market is an old and tired Libertardian argument that has been addressed in multiple articles.

            Functionally, the free market is against the Alt-Right as things stand now anyway, because we would mess up their insane margins from relying on slave non-White labor, so regardless of any abstract theories you toss my way, functionally we will never worship Mammon/the free market.

          • Solo et Sanguis 15 August, 2017 at 11:54

            OK let me put this another way and more succinctly because I am being sincere here when I asked this question, I am not trying to turn this into some shouting match:

            Why Socialism?

            I get you don’t like capitalism or libertarianism – so I get that you are opposed to individual liberties and freedoms. That’s fine, that’s you position here, cool.

            Now, Why Socialism?

            How will socialism, putting the power of the government in the hands of a few easily corruptible people, prove successful in the long run? What will you do when a few people at the top of your socialistic society are bought off by the Jews (since it is very easy for them to buy off a few people versus buy off a whole population)?

            Again, why is socialism better suited to handle this sort of co-option?

          • Vincent Law 15 August, 2017 at 12:03

            I see what you are saying.

            This is just my opinion, I don’t speak for everyone.

            To directly address your critique, we would need to structure society so that the military caste calls the shots.

            Having to serve and being given privileges that can’t be bought makes it harder to corrupt a military caste. When everything is for sale, then you’re right, eventually it will be corrupted.

            Some things should only be reachable through service.

          • Solo et Sanguis 15 August, 2017 at 12:12

            OK now we are getting to some common ground. So you envision something like the Robert Heinlein world of Starship Troopers? Where in order to even receive voting rights you had to serve the State? That may not be entirely your position, it’s just what I thought of based on your response.

            I’m fine with this to an extent, so long as the military is used in defense of the people who compose its ranks (rather than foreign interests or even corporate interests abroad). Basically, people who make our political decisions need to have some skin in the game – maybe we agree on that?

            I still think having the military call the shots could be an issue, depending on how it is structured, that too could be easily corrupted by outside forces. Say for example, you have a civil leader who seeks to do X that will be beneficial to the people of the State, but detrimental to a foreign nation that has the resources to co-opt the military leadership and push them into a coup d’etat. How would that be prevented?

            That’s more a rhetorical question, I don’t expect you to have a firm answer since even I don’t, it’s something I’d have to think about and how we’d structure checks and balances to ensure the military remains at all times loyal to the State and the People versus either civil leadership (who could be corrupted) or outside foreign forces (who could corrupt the military).

            However, I would note that such a system doesn’t necessarily have to be socialistic. The world of Starship Troopers was not socialistic, I don’t believe. Fascistic in the dictionary definition, certainly, but not particularly socialistic from what I recall.

            Socialism and Fascism share some points, much as Capitalism and Socialism also share some points, but they are mostly different systems. Sort of why Il Duce considered it the “Third Way”.

          • Vincent Law 15 August, 2017 at 12:16

            What matters is what traits and what class of people are selected for success in your society.

            As it stands, destroying your own people is a solid way to make a quick buck.

            We need a system that puts our people before profits. A system that encourages an elite that isn’t treacherous, but committed to uplifting the masses.

            Never read Starship Troopers, I just envisioned a society in which the elites gave a damn.

          • Solo et Sanguis 15 August, 2017 at 12:42

            If you get a chance, check it out. It’s really more a political treatise rather than a science fiction novel. But it raises some interesting ideas that could potentially be worked into a more ideal society. At the very least having people run our government or make our political decisions who, as you say, care more about the people that put them there (or maintain their legitimacy if we abandon republicanism or democracy) rather than outside interests or their own self interests.

            The US Founders understood that people are always going to have their own self interests first and foremost, so they designed a system that, had it not been corrupted and screwed with, would have ensured for the most part that ambition would check ambition. That sort of system doesn’t get much progress accomplished, it could be argued, but it ensures too that it’s less likely the people will get screwed over by a cabal of well connected interests and/or foreign interests who seek to subvert the population.

            But in the end, having a voting population that has skin in the game who elect people (or again, maintain their legitimacy if we go without voting) who come from those ranks would be a vast improvement over what we are stuck with today.

      • Crud Bonemeal 15 August, 2017 at 12:12 Reply

        “National mixed economy-ism” just isn’t very catchy.

        I mostly deal with conservative / libertarian type people, so I have to challenge them on their ideas that all we need is unrestricted capitalism and all our problems will magically be solved.

        IMHO this is kind of masking an unwillingness to govern as people normally did, and to exercise power when it is needed. This is a big part of why the left constantly rides herd on them.

        I want a normal mixed economy, like most countries on earth. But run to
        benefit our nation, rather than transnational elites. What policies work best for this are
        an empirical question, and I don’t have all the answers, but my layman’s opinion would lean towards less
        government involvement than average and significantly less welfare, but
        not necessarily zero welfare.

        Between libertarianism and neoliberalism, I think we have enough people defending capitalism, and while it obviously works to some significant degree, claiming that it works perfectly with no intervention does not seem defensible.

        For example, think there may be some validity to wage and hour laws, rules on safe working conditions, some environmental protection, etc. Not that they’ve always been implemented perfectly, quite the opposite, they’ve often been weaponized, but I don’t see them as inherently immoral.

        Additionally, in the current year I see some significant danger from nominally private entities like Google, Facebook, etc. that have achieved immense power over our society, and that are run by individuals who do not necessarily have the interests of our people in mind. And I don’t think it would be in our national interest to refuse to regulate them because of some abstract idea that regulation is always bad. In fact, I want to regulate the fuck out of Zuckerberg.

        And I’m simply unconvinced that free trade is “always beneficial”, and it looks to me like the U.S. historically benefited quite a bit from protectionist trade policies, and that free trade policies have, at times, been used in a way that benefited elites at the expense of the average person.

        Finally, I do not view public ownership and/or involvement in industry as inherently immoral, although it is often a bad idea. The obvious example would be armaments industries necessary for the nation to defend itself, but this could also extend to a legitimate national interest in not having sensitive electronics produced in rival countries, etc. It’s a practical question, not a moral question, and practically, it’s usually less government that is good, but that’s not always the case, sometimes the state should step in to protect the nation.

        To your average libertarianism addled American, this is socialism. Well, so be it. I don’t mind thinking of myself as a socialist and indirectly moralizing a little socialism if Bryan Caplan’s hell on earth vision represents unrestricted capitalism.

        Of course, I don’t necessarily think it’s good to use the word socialism. In many circumstances it can be counter productive, when you can instead just meme common sense non-ideological economics, like most of the countries on earth already have.

        “Look, I don’t see enough evidence to indicate really need to radically reorganize our economy according to some morality based social experiment, let’s just make it work a little better for our people.”

        For less practical and more philosophical approach, see Oswald Spengler Prussianism and Socialism

        • Solo et Sanguis 15 August, 2017 at 12:48 Reply

          Excellent response. I am going to take some time to digest it (along with some lunch) and respond with my thought a bit later this afternoon. Thanks again for the well thought out response. Initially I can say, by the points you raise, I can agree to a little “socialism” in some of those cases. Prime example you mention that stuck out to me would be building sensitive military systems “in house” rather than with foreign labor. I often found it odd that our uniforms were made overseas, even if it’s cheaper, seems counter the idea that the military is something meant to defend the people and the nation when it’s benefiting a foreign contractor.

        • Solo et Sanguis 15 August, 2017 at 14:04 Reply

          OK so on your first point, even though I consider myself fairly libertarian, I know that if we tried to go to a free market system NOW it would fail miserably, mainly because the field is already so uneven that trying to remove all regulations or restrictions would ensure the already gigantic industries maintain their stranglehold on society for centuries to come. For example (as you mention later) Google and Facebook. Without government regulation or restrictions, they would continue to grow and grow until there is no possibility of over countering their duopoly over our social media.

          Something does need to be done about them, though I worry that having our current political leadership make those decisions will only turn out badly for us, and indeed anyone in a minority viewpoint. Here is where I prefer as few regulations as possible in regards to the Google/Facebook issue, and in particular, specifically designed to address the overarching issue. For example, declaring them a public common and requiring they honor the rights listed in the Bill of Rights. They are still American companies, they need to follow American values and laws (rather than Germany, EU, or China). Sure, they might lose some market share or profits, but like Vincent Law said below, they need to put people before their profits. Requiring them to honor our Bill of Rights (and sanctioning them for every individual offense if they do not) would go a long ways to ensure that. And as justification, if a business owner no longer has the right of free association per the Civil Rights Act, then so too could the ability of Google/Facebook to decide what speech they allow and which they do not could be restricted.

          I’d rather leave it up to the free market as a libertarian, but again, I know that the playing field is already so un-level that there are no viable competitors to their duopoly – So there I do favor some government intrusion into the market place ONLY if it is directed specifically at the issue at hand. Otherwise, I fear it will just be used to their advantage to crush any competitors and somehow further limit speech they disagree with.

          In regards to welfare, I would prefer no state maintained or regulated welfare. Rather, it should be down to voluntary associations at the local and community levels. Maybe even national non-profits of course. But ultimately, so long as the government is handing out welfare, there will always be a magnet to draw the least favorable people to our nations. Even if we specify it goes to citizens only, they will still find ways to garner some of that welfare through either fraud or appeal to emotion. Whereas in a voluntary system, people can freely choose who they will benefit. And they can choose to limit it to specific groups or specific communities.

          I know leftists (and unfortunately some on the right) will decry this as potential for racism, and they’re right, but so what? If the NAACP or LULAC or even AIPAC can exist for their communities, why cannot Whites? That’s a rhetorical question, since we already know the answer is because we are white we are not allowed to promote or maintain our own communities. Ultimately people will end up self-segregating and America (at least, perhaps Europe as well, but not sure how the dynamics there would work being they have a stronger claim to actual nationalism than Americans do) will be more peaceful for it when people are no longer forced to live with each other or benefit people outside their groups.

          One of my main concerns about a socialistic system, however, I addressed with Vincent below. Socialism, unfortunately, tends to concentrate power in the hands of a few people (unfortunately, modern crony capitalism does the same thing) – this makes it very easy to control an entire nation by controlling those few people at the top. We need diffuse systems where people, ideally, favor the State as well as one another over foreigners and corrupted interests domestic and foreign.

          Unfortunately, there is still the whole human nature thing that leads people to do what is in their self interests and often to the detriment of those around them. For example, decrying the very movement that helped to elect you so that the mean MSM won’t call you names anymore (yet they still will). Sorry, I digress, still a sore spot for me in light of this weekend’s events. In any event, I fully expect hoi poloi and political elites alike in this hypothetical society to do what is in their own self interests – the question then becomes, how do we protect that society from the greed of those groups to sell out to a foreign interest and thus doom their society to extinction as we see currently happening in the West?

          Vincent suggested a sort of military caste that would serve as the guard of society, but I still worry that even such an organization could also be corrupted, depending on how it is structured or maintained. Limiting political involvement to those who have in some way served the State (and ONLY the state, not foreign interests or corporate interests who seek to subvert that society) would be a good step, as it would ensure that those who can vote or hold office have some skin in the game and some understanding of the spirit of the society and the moral fabric it is built upon (assuming in this hypothetical society such things are taught correctly rather than corrupted or even eliminated and declared anathema).

          OK sorry I went on so long, just wanted to give a fuller detailed response to the points you raised. I’ll close by saying again, even though I am fairly libertarian, I can agree to some government restriction and regulations, so long as they are specifically meant to address and resolve the issue for which they are intended. If it only serves to artificially prop up an industry that deserves to die off if they don’t reform, or as a sort of payback for political support of a particular candidate, then I am pretty well opposed to those types of regulations that litter our political landscape today.

  19. Marathon-Youth 15 August, 2017 at 10:46 Reply

    It is time to look at the monuments of the Founding Fathers. 41 signatories to the Constitution (including Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson) owned slaves.

    They must come down. No public monument of them. We must demand that by law. If they are allowed to stand then so should Confederate monuments.

    If Monuments to the Confederacy must fall then so should ANY monument that has any connection to slavery.

  20. Harry Savannah 15 August, 2017 at 10:18 Reply

    Interestingly, the “fairest” was Savage. He invited an AlRight rally attendee to actually state the case of THE FACTS ON THE GROUND. Interesting to see if he PAYS for this outrage.

    • Albionic American 15 August, 2017 at 11:04 Reply

      The cyberattackers seem to have ignored TheRightStuff.biz. I wonder if they did that deliberately to try to generate suspicion against Enoch and his gang.

  21. America First and ONLY America 15 August, 2017 at 07:24 Reply

    I just want some of these people, especially our traitor in chief, to call out the BLM and Antifa as the terrorists they are. I know they say our mere existence as whites is terroristic and that our defending our culture is violent intimidation, but we’ve never caused riots, we’ve never thrown bricks at people we disagree with, we’ve never surrounded people and maced them. All of this and more has been done by them in response to our desire to exercise our supposed rights.

    Where is our DoJ to investigate the abuse of OUR civil rights? Honestly, after this weekend I just might go back to not paying taxes. I’ll still file (because that’s how they get you) but if I don’t have any civil rights here anymore, they’re not getting my money.

  22. Fr. John+ 15 August, 2017 at 07:14 Reply

    1. I’m a boomer.
    2. I’m a conservative – meaning, I want to conserve (hold sacred, keep in remembrance, laud and glorify) EVERYTHING my White Ancestors did that was ‘pure, noble, good’ and, as St. Paul says, we are to always ‘think on these things.’

    Now, having said that, (and for you guys of my generation- the ‘lost’ generation who actually thought Hippies, Woodstock, Rock, Drugs, and profligate sex were ‘cool’) I am THRILLED that the Civil War against the White Race, has now openly showed itself to the damned stupid of my era.

    Because that is what C’ville was- the Jewish Beast let slip its facade of ‘tolerance’ and you saw every single one of the irredeemable- Blacks, Sodomites, Feminazis, Socialist Bernie-ites, post-menopausal cat ladies- in full fury against WHITE Americans.

    NOW, with Trump’s utter spinelessness, he’s lost (at least in my eyes) THE ONE GROUP THAT HELPED ELECT HIM. And, the cognitive dissonance (among the Boomer Cucks- and, Lo, they are legion!) is so strong now, that one more ‘tipping point’ will shift the balance. The Overton Window is open and a fresh breath of Right-eous air is blowing in the ‘windmills of their minds.’ And I thank GOD for it.

  23. Dylan Kroll 15 August, 2017 at 01:49 Reply

    What I have always wondered is, where do people get off thinking all the supposedly great things about Western civilization and culture just arose spontaneously and by sheer coincidence? Capitalism, democracy, common law, scientific discoveries, tech innovations, almost all great art, literature, etc was spawned from white Europeans. There’s just as many people around to think up these big ideas in Africa or Asia, and they’ve had just as much time to work on it, and yet… where are all these examples? If everyone is the same as race doesn’t matter, how come the ancient Greco-Roman philosophers that kickstarted the greatest culture known to man were all white Europeans? It can’t be coincidence, that is more far-fetched a claim to make than any of the “awful” things the alt-right says.

        • Stokely Carmichael 15 August, 2017 at 02:07 Reply

          I think that explains you’re inability to discuss intellectual concepts beyond the realm of Western “civilization”. Maybe a Dukes of Hazzard box set? Might cheer you up.

          • WHAT 15 August, 2017 at 05:28

            You know, when day of the wheel gives way to the day of the rope, they will preserve you in a museum.

          • Captain John Charity Spring MA 15 August, 2017 at 06:30

            The wall that you hit as an abstract thinker ( a socialist, progressive or some type of conservative) is Mugabe’s Zimbabwe or Amin’s Uganda. Even the most ardent black nationalist wouldnt migrate TO the Mudderland if the choice is living off and among whites.

          • KiddBlast 15 August, 2017 at 08:07

            “Intellectual concepts”? You mean those treasures of thought recorded in written African languages that rival those of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle? Oh, wait… There were no written languages in sub-Saharan Africa until the 20th Century. My bad…

          • Drew Bowler 15 August, 2017 at 19:27

            Don’t forget there are tribes there that can’t even make fire. They can maintain it, but lack the concepts that we have had for millennia. There are others that believe raping an infant will cure them of AIDS. There are tribes that eat cow vagina because the bacteria in it makes their gonads swell from infection, thereby making them more of a man in their twisted, warped mindset. You can’t make this shit up. The ones here have a collective IQ of 84, where the threshold for mentally challenged people is around 78-80 depending on what researcher is asked. So it can be postulated that they are borderline retarded, plain and simple.

          • KiddBlast 16 August, 2017 at 10:00

            No, you can’t make it up.

            The pattern is always the same, whether in Haiti, Zaire, Belgian Congo, Rhodesia or South Africa: Drive out the Whites who made the country thrive and flourish in the name of “liberation”, install corrupt, incompetent leaders who destroy the country by failing to exploit its resources and plunging it into poverty, then blame the Whites for the disaster and demand that other countries pay to repair it. Finally, when that inevitably fails, invade Europe by the millions and hope for the best.

            There is NO sum of money that will repair the problem, no amount of schools or foreign aid workers to educate them or teach them how to be productive on their own.

            The worst thing: Not a single politician or business leader will admit it because “racism”.

            The best thing to do – the only thing, really – would be to recolonize the whole shebang under “beneficent” western leadership.

          • Smash Islamophobia 16 August, 2017 at 00:14

            Here I chime in to support you– with your favorite slogan, no less, and you still whine. The Far Left is so ungrateful. Sad.

      • NotYouNotSure 15 August, 2017 at 03:51 Reply

        You don’t read very much, do you ? Nothing he said is incorrect, there is nothing of great value that came out of sub Saharan Africa. One can discuss Chinese civilization or even Indian civilization and their notable ideas and inventions, but I suggest you don’t because if anything it simply proves that the races are even more unequal than even you deep down admit to be true.

      • Jarl 15 August, 2017 at 12:01 Reply

        Going to boomer tourist traps in Europe isn’t traveling, numbskull. Having been all over southeast Asia and the near/middle east myself, I can say honestly that your line of thinking is not standard there. From my experience, it’s only in the bourgeois portions of the west. You are not the “world citizen” man of they people you believe yourself to be. You are WEIRD.

      • Stokely Carmichael 15 August, 2017 at 01:37 Reply

        Should I just be quiet? Maybe its the jews and the MSM that are trying to keep me quiet. Which one are you. I suspicious now.

        • PrometheusReturns 15 August, 2017 at 01:48 Reply

          You’re not clever enough to be a troll. You don’t understand the platform you’re using.

          No wonder you dopes are losing.

          • Stokely Carmichael 15 August, 2017 at 02:03

            Losing what? Trump government collapsing. Alt-Right, Neo Nazis et all getting barred from the web. Condemnation of racism from the Right. They’re taking down your flags and statues. I hate to be the one to break it to you, but, I don’t think the South will rise again. Just saying…….

          • PrometheusReturns 15 August, 2017 at 02:09

            Neo-Nazis

            Your flags
            Your statues
            Just saying……

            No you’re not “just saying.” You’re just repeating. You’re a stupid, indoctrinated parrot. You’re literally so stupid you repeating every MSM slogan you’ve ever heard. You’re here because you’re a useful idiot, a golem. You’re among the same losers who thought Hillary would win by a landslide. You’re so utterly retarded you believe everyone is magically a “Neo-Nazi” and so autistically self-righteous you’re on a witch hunt to prove it.

            Keep doing what you’re doing!

          • Stokely Carmichael 15 August, 2017 at 02:18

            You seriously think the southern states have the same influence that either coast or the north east elite do? Hee Haw!

          • Stokely Carmichael 15 August, 2017 at 02:19

            I Don’t agree with who? Don’t you mean you don’t agree? Just trying to help with the old pro-nouns.

          • Stokely Carmichael 15 August, 2017 at 02:18

            I had to look up Golem. Had no idea. Thanks for that. Who’d of thought I’d come away smarter from talking to to you. Isn’t it a lovely multicultural society we live in?

          • Captain John Charity Spring MA 15 August, 2017 at 06:32

            The Republicans are not the “right”. They are just liberals circa 1990.

    • WR_the_realist 15 August, 2017 at 02:50 Reply

      No. I suppose he could LARP as War Hammer 88! but then he’d get about as far as the white nationalists in the 60s and 70s got.

  24. J_Bonaccorsi_Philadelphia 15 August, 2017 at 01:06 Reply

    “Finally, let’s remember that the ‘Unite the Right’ protest was using the Robert E. Lee statue as its focal point. Protecting the monuments of historical American figures, including the Founders who are presumably up next, is quite a popular stance among great swathes of the American public, including these boomer conservatives.”

    The monuments to the Confederacy are a Southern Nationalist concern, not an alt-right concern.

    • Stokely Carmichael 15 August, 2017 at 01:20 Reply

      What if they took down all the statues to confederate heroes and just put “The Dukes of Hazzard” car in a glass case for you to gather around?

        • Stokely Carmichael 15 August, 2017 at 01:33 Reply

          I’m trying to find a solution to suit everybody. “The Dukes of Hazard” was a TV show that ran from 1979 to 1985. Very Popular too. The main characters had a Dodge Charger called “General Lee” that had the stars and bars painted on the top. Given your propensity for that flag that represent the defeat of the south in civil war and the subsequent marker for hatred within right wing movements, I thought perhaps everyone could enjoy a car from a TV show while celebrating the defeat of slavery.

          • J_Bonaccorsi_Philadelphia 15 August, 2017 at 01:36

            I didn’t indicate I had any “propensity” for the Confederate flag.

          • Stokely Carmichael 15 August, 2017 at 01:41

            “The monuments to the Confederacy are a Southern Nationalist concern, not an alt-right concern”. My bad. Your comments lead me to believe that might be the type of thing you’d celebrate. Sorry. Swastika? How about that? Thoughts?

          • J_Bonaccorsi_Philadelphia 15 August, 2017 at 01:52

            Well, the Nazi flag represents, I guess, totalitarianism and anti-Semitism–so I have mixed feelings about that one.

          • Junius Daniel 15 August, 2017 at 13:10

            That’s true, John, but, as well, The Nazi Flag represents the same thing as does the Confederate flag …

            The right of a people, in this case The German, to live outside of the realm of dominance by aliens, alien ideas, and alien entities,

    • WR_the_realist 15 August, 2017 at 02:53 Reply

      It’s an alt right concern because we all know that this is not about those statues being of confederate generals but because it is about those statues being of prominent, accomplished, and admired white men. If you think Thomas Jefferson and George Washington aren’t next on the list, you are a fool.

      • J_Bonaccorsi_Philadelphia 15 August, 2017 at 02:59 Reply

        No, we don’t “all know that this is not about those statues being of confederate generals but because it is about those statues being of prominent, accomplished, and admired white men.” It’s about opposition to the Confederacy and the Confederacy’s cause, which was slavery.

          • J_Bonaccorsi_Philadelphia 15 August, 2017 at 03:19

            If you think I’m going to go back and forth with you about this–as champions and opponents of the Confederacy have been going back and forth about it for a century-and-a-half–you’re mistaken. That sort of wrangling–about the meaning of the Confederacy, its flags, and its monuments–is exactly the thing in which the alt-right has now entangled itself.

        • Junius Daniel 15 August, 2017 at 13:08 Reply

          Unfortunately, John, the statement that ‘the cause of the Confederacy was slavery’ is not accurate, but, rather, this…

          The cause of The Confederacy was to determine what form of economick exploitation it wisht for itself, as well as every other custom.

          The Cause of The Union was to impose it’s ideas of human exploitation (slavery in all but name) upon the South, which is still the cause of ‘The Union – that criminal organization known as ‘The United States government’.

          Those were and are, Sir, objectively, speaking, ‘the causes’.

          • J_Bonaccorsi_Philadelphia 15 August, 2017 at 21:35

            As I said to another commenter–maybe in this same thread, Junius–there’s little point in our going back and forth about this subject, the way champions and opponents of the Confederacy have been going back and forth about it for a century-and-a-half. My real objection is to “Unite the Right” itself. In my view, the entire alt-right has been compromised, by association with Southern Nationalism. Now, every member of the alt-right is entangled in this endless wrangling over the meaning of the Confederacy, its flag, and its monuments. I made clear enough, I think, at Occidental Dissent, that any non-Southerner who might attend “Unite the Right” would be, in my view, unwise to do so. That the event turned out to be a stunningly counter-productive demonstration of incompetence on the part of its organizers has certainly not led me to abandon that view.

          • Junius Daniel 15 August, 2017 at 21:53

            Unfortunately, John, the government in Washington D.C. is so lawless and anti-White that those of us, Southerners, who still have the guts to think, have no choice but, to wish to be away from it.

            As to the rally, it was merely a 1st Manassas – some good and some bad – depending on your view.

            Be sure – I want and value your friendship, but, the country to which you consider me to be intrinsically bound I do not.

            It is a vile pox upon humanity, as tens of millions of people around the world would attest, they having been bombed, starved, and bribed at gunpoint, over recent decades by ‘The United States of America’.

            God bless you and your mama!

          • J_Bonaccorsi_Philadelphia 15 August, 2017 at 22:02

            No, I think you’ve misunderstood me, Junius. I understand that you don’t feel bound to the U.S. My objection is to “Unite the Right.” The alt-right has now been bound to Southern Nationalism. Any non-Southerner who, by attending the event, acquiesced in the binding, was unwise.

          • Junius Daniel 15 August, 2017 at 23:10

            I see.

            I thank you for the clarification.

            If I may, I think that the Yankees who joined us feel that if they don’t help us to prevent the complete destruction of our White culture, y’all will be next.

            The fact that I see more and more Yankees speaking out and joining us in the fight, the more uplifted is my heart.

            I’m having to learn that Northerners actually are capable, collectively, of being friendly towards us.

            At my age, that’s a nice thing.

            Have a good night!

          • J_Bonaccorsi_Philadelphia 16 August, 2017 at 17:35

            You know, Junius, that I’m not the South’s friend, if that means an admirer of the Confederacy. I doubt you’d expect me to uphold the Confederacy’s flag, regardless of whether some symbol held dear by me would be the left’s next target.

          • Junius Daniel 17 August, 2017 at 05:47

            I understand, John, but, what I expect of you, in light of your extreme intelligence, is to purse what you regard is in the interest of your and your kind, and, in light of whom you regard as ‘your kind’, and how you see that, I will remind you that if they succeed in culturally cleansing me and mine, below the Mason-Dixon Line, they will come for your culture next.

            Your White Northern ancestors are soon to be on the chopping block.

            Give that some thought – in relation to your ‘animus’

            God bless you!

          • J_Bonaccorsi_Philadelphia 17 August, 2017 at 13:14

            My affection for you, Junius, means, of course, that it pains me to be unable to sympathize with or support you while something of great meaning to you is under attack. The situation is not comparable to anything; it is unique.

            It’s funny, Junius: In my early childhood, which took place in the middle and late 1950s and thus roughly coincided, I think, with your own, the blacks I saw here, in northeast Philadelphia, were few. A Jewish family, two doors away, had an elderly black maid–Jeanie, she was called–who might have been the first black person of whom I was aware. I remember a moment, in my childhood, when she emerged from the basement door, at the back of their house, and I was startled by the sight of her. At a later point, in the aftermath of a brief hospitalization of my then-young mother, my parents hired a black lady who came in for a while–and who came again, maybe, over one or more of the following years–to help my mother with housecleaning. Leola she was named, and maybe you’ll agree that that sounds like a name she might have brought northward, from below the Mason-Dixie line. Many years, much more than a decade maybe, after that brief involvement of her with my family, she telephoned our house, to speak with my mother and to express her fondness for my mother’s children, including me, who were, by then, grown persons. When I, who happened to pick up the phone, said hello, she said, as I recall, only, “This is Leola,” as if she knew–correctly, as it turned out–that I would not have the slightest uncertainty about her identity.

            As I would look out our kitchen window, in those childhood days of mine, I could see, on the day of the weekly trash collection, black men doing the only work that, as far as I knew, black men were paid to do. As they trudged along behind the trash truck and picked up the trash at one house after another, including mine, they were, in my child’s mind, the very image of something that I somehow sensed: abjection.

            You know well enough, Junius, that I’m a racist, that I think blacks and whites should not be living among each other at all; but you must know, too, that I would never uphold the Confederate flag, the Confederate statues, or any of the rest of it. The situation is, as I say, unique. When you suggest I should uphold those things because things of meaning to me are next on the target list, you do me, my friend, a disservice.

          • Junius Daniel 17 August, 2017 at 13:48

            Thank you, Dear John. We have been under attack since the 1940s – an undeclared war against The Southron White Race, waged through the courts, media, and by corporations. As our opponents have evincet an undeniable lust for our blood, it will only be solved by barbarity.
            The dilemma is, however, that we have become too civilized.
            In such a situation, bourgeoisie civility is tatamount to death.
            Thank you for your kind note.
            I’ve given you my warning, with the best of intents : if they finish us, y’all will be next.

          • J_Bonaccorsi_Philadelphia 17 August, 2017 at 14:53

            Not sure whether you saw it, Junius; but at Occidental Dissent, over the past few weeks, I posted and then re-posted, to you, a passage from “The Creed of the Old South,” by Basil Lanneau Gildersleeve. Gildersleeve, as maybe you know, was a classical scholar, who was born in South Carolina, graduated from Princeton, and awarded a doctorate by the University of Gottingen. His twenty-year professorship at the University of Virginia was interrupted by his service in the Confederate army.

            About four-fifths of the way through “The Creed of the Old South,” Gildersleeve writes of two occasions on which he was in the company of James Russell Lowell, the New England writer who, as Gildersleeve says, “had wielded the flail of his ‘lashing hail’ against the South and the Southern cause and ‘Southern sympathizers’” during the Civil War (as I, a Northerner, shall call that conflict).

            “The Creed of the Old South” originally appeared in 1892, as an article in the Atlantic Monthly; but in 1915, the jubilee of the war’s end, it was republished, in book form, with another Gildersleeve piece, “A Southerner in the Peloponnesian War.”

            The first of the two encounters between Gildersleeve and Lowell took place, as Gildersleeve explains, around 1877, during a month in which Lowell was lecturing in Baltimore. The second encounter seems to have taken place in the same month.

            Without presuming to compare me to Lowell or you to Gildersleeve, I present, from “The Creed of the Old South,” the passage below. Gildersleeve, as you’ll see, cites a poem in which Lowell esteems Virginia as George Washington’s birth place …

            “On the second occasion [Lowell and I] were passing together under the shadow of the Washington Monument, and the name of Lee came by some chance into the current of talk. Here Mr. Lowell could not refrain from expressing his view of Lee’s course in turning against the government to which he had sworn allegiance. Doubtless he felt it to be his duty to emphasize his conviction as to a vital clause of his creed, but it instantly became evident that this was a theme that could not be profitably pursued, and we walked in silence the rest of the way,—the author of the line

            Virginia gave us this imperial man,

            and the follower of that other imperial man Virginia gave the world; both honest, each believing the other hopelessly wrong, but absolutely sincere.”

          • Junius Daniel 17 August, 2017 at 20:38

            Dear John, ‘The United States’ is an abstract construct, and, as such, any loyalty to such would always have to be superceded by a loyalty to one’s own kind.

            Never in a million years would I expect you to put your loyalty to the state of Pennsylvania over that to your mama; and, likewise, the notion that Lee would put Washington ahead of Richmond would fall into that vein.

            That said, this is a brilliant and fabulously nuancet remark.

            I never doubt your sincerity nor your honour.

            No, sir, what I doubt, in this case, is your ability to ascertain what is threatening the South is what is threatening you.

            Your collective animus is clouding your judgement, as is thy right.

            As I note more and more Yankees active in our midst, I defend them against your criticism, because I know why they do it.

            They have awakened to a pressing sensibility, which, as of yet, has, somehow, dodged you.

            It’s a strange thing to say, because your writings convince me that nary a thing dodges you, but, in this case, we must make an exception.

            In any case, God bless you!

          • J_Bonaccorsi_Philadelphia 18 August, 2017 at 00:21

            Uh-oh, Junius–If we’re all going to work together, north and south, to preserve our history, it looks as if you’re going to have to come up to Chicago, to defend that monument of Abraham Lincoln. (Don’t worry; I won’t press you on that.)

            Anyway–I’m glad you appreciated the passage from Mr. Gildersleeve. Really, his account of his encounter with James Russell Lowell did remind me of you and me. We’re prisoners of history.

          • Junius Daniel 18 August, 2017 at 02:19

            I would say ‘touche’ to that, John, but, in this ever increasingly difficult circumstance, I’ve had to change my stance.

            I WILL support and encourage White Northerners to preserve their culture, and I WILL work with them, until we have chaset away our mutual enemy.

            But, no, I don’t want to go to Chicago. I don’t like ‘The Windy City or their pizza

            I’d rather fight in the street of Philly, where the finest thin crust pizza is available, and, if I get thirsty, I can stop over at your mama’s for some a beverage.

            Hopefully she don’t serve green tea – as I can’t stand the sight of it!

          • J_Bonaccorsi_Philadelphia 18 August, 2017 at 05:17

            I hear ya, Junius, re thin-crust. A friend of mine who’s better informed on the subject than am I might tell you that thin-crust is getting harder to come by in this particular neighborhood, but I’m sure it’s still to be had in other parts of the city. No green tea problem.

          • Junius Daniel 18 August, 2017 at 10:31

            A lack of thin crust, Dear John, is an irrefutable sign of White demographick replacement:::))))

          • Nightmare 18 August, 2017 at 12:18

            Junius, thank you for affirming my judgement of Alt-Right and AltRight.com. I’ll seek you out there.

            Good people ought to be armed as they will, with wits and guns and The Truth.

          • Junius Daniel 18 August, 2017 at 12:35

            God bless you, Nightmare. I go regularly to Alt-right.com, and, as well, Occidental Dissent, and, here you can join me at VK social media, (English language version of Russian social media) where, unlike at FB and ‘TWITTER’, White men can speak without being harasst by feminist socialist ninnies.

            https://vk.com/id382260533

    • Charlie Primero 15 August, 2017 at 05:01 Reply

      And they completely failed to make “erasure of our history” a headline.

      And they completely failed to Unite the Right.

      And they completely failed to use the Dodge Challenger as an example of self-defense.

      Maybe more talking points from a unified front next time in Texas, and less Tiki.

    • Solo et Sanguis 15 August, 2017 at 11:19 Reply

      I get where you are coming from in your comments below but you have to understand there is a slippery slope going on here. Even if you absolutely hate the South and the Confederacy, you have to understand that if we let them destroy those statues, they WILL seek to destroy all the other statues next. Whether it be Founding Fathers, Shakespeare, Oliver Cromwell, or any other number of unnamed statues that have the misfortune to depict White Men. They literally seek to do the same as ISIS and destroy all traces of history of the White peoples around the globe.

      • J_Bonaccorsi_Philadelphia 15 August, 2017 at 21:41 Reply

        That might be true; but even if I were convinced it’s true, I would not defend the Confederacy. If attacks come on other figures, such as the figures you’ve mentioned, those attacks will simply have to be dealt with. To avoid a slippery slope, as you say, I’m not going to defend something I think shouldn’t be defended.

        • Solo et Sanguis 16 August, 2017 at 08:06 Reply

          That’s an idiotic position, and I don’t use that word lightly. It is idiotic to wait to fight that fight then when you can avoid it entirely by fighting the fight now.

          Even if you hate everything about the South, by standing up to these iconoclasts now, you avoid having to deal with them coming for the next sets of statues and destroying further history then.

          • J_Bonaccorsi_Philadelphia 16 August, 2017 at 14:57

            It’s not an idiotic position. It’s a principled position, which, I imagine, is something with which Southerners are not familiar.

          • Solo et Sanguis 16 August, 2017 at 15:10

            Ah, I see, you really don’t know Southerns or why they fought the civil war then. You probably think it was about keeping slavery I assume? That’s fine. Enjoy your idiocy and maybe your principles will shield you from a bat to your head from Antifa?

  25. Daniel 15 August, 2017 at 00:40 Reply

    I don’t care if you are white, green, black, yellow, or purple. as long as you are educated and financially well off. To me that is upper class. I just can’t stand uneducated, low income garbage in any race.

    • NotYouNotSure 15 August, 2017 at 03:55 Reply

      How enlightened of you, you don’t people – except for people with less money than you. I suggest you carefully rethink your position you are trying to sell, because you should be aware that sub Saharan Africa consists of a billion poor low income people.

      • Daniel 16 August, 2017 at 10:23 Reply

        souls??? worship???? you sound like one of those religious fanatics. Education and Financial freedom are measure of success. Look at those soulless ants in Asian countries, highly educated, financially successful and help purchase US manufactured goods from Boings, Honeywells, and many of US defense industries. For example, US defense industries’ most valued customers are those soulless countries in the land of Ants.

        Beside…. those ants are much superior than uneducated, misinformed, trailer park KKK or wanna-be nazis and their supporter KKKrazy Donnie. LOL

  26. Classical Liberal Warrior 15 August, 2017 at 00:17 Reply

    Alt-rightism seems like failed libertarianism. The alt-right doesn’t actually advocate laissez-faire capitalism or Natural Law. When it comes to legalizing drugs, prostitution, gambling, and broadcast obscenity the alt-right seems solidly pro-fascist and anti-liberty. As for getting rid of Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Welfare, ObamaCare, etc. the alt-right seems solidly pro-socialist and anti-liberty. Same with privatizing the roads and schools. The alt-right NEVER seems to favor freedom and individual rights on the important issues.

    • Skorzeny44 15 August, 2017 at 04:05 Reply

      I can’t speak for the “alt-right” but I can speak as someone who has been a racialist for 30 years. Economics, social issues, religion, etc. all come in secondary importance to RACE for a real racialist/racist. Personal freedom also is of secondary importance when talking about the survival of the White Race and culture. You seem more concerned with libertarianism than the survival of the White Race and White Civilization.

    • Captain John Charity Spring MA 15 August, 2017 at 06:39 Reply

      The Alt-Right is the recognition that you only get to have your libertarian, socialist, communist, conservative utopia if your population is mostly white. Introduce an element of black or brown and the entire political system becomes a racial spoils distribution network run by Jews for the benefit of the darkies off
      The back of a white working class. See Sweden today. Used to run smoothly and was the envy of the world. Now it’s a car-b-que.

    • Albionic American 15 August, 2017 at 10:45 Reply

      Uh, our elites don’t find “libertarianism” threatening. Just look at that goof Ron Paul. He can condemn fiat money and the Federal Reserve all he wants, yet no one tries to disrupt his public appearances, bans him from entering certain countries, tries to hurt him financially, sucker-punches him, sprays his eyes with caustic chemicals and so forth. He has had a comfortable life as a phony adversary of the powerful because he has chosen things to attack where he knows his criticisms will just bounce off and not result in retaliation to himself.

    • -- 15 August, 2017 at 10:54 Reply

      Libertarianism is actually half-formed alt-rightism. It describes white ethics, but is too cucked and/or subversive to acknowledge that it is describing *exclusively* white ethics. Other races (on average!) can’t grasp and don’t care about abstract BS like the NAP and the invisible hand.

    • Crud Bonemeal 15 August, 2017 at 11:05 Reply

      The Alt-Right doesn’t really have an unified opinion on a lot of those issues, and favors a robust political debate and or different solutions for different jurisdictions.

      The Alt-Right doesn’t see mindless devotion to laissez faire capitalism as a particularly sensible attitude, and argues that under some circumstances laissez faire capitalism might lead to policies that could conflict with the interests of our nation, for example, if it was cheaper for the U.S. to make their nuclear weapons in China instead of domestically, that might not be a good idea.

      But otherwise, the Alt-Right doesn’t have a unified position on economics, favoring a robust political debate and or different solutions for different jurisdictions, to figure out what would benefit a particular nation or polity.

      The Alt-Right also doesn’t particularly care about social security or tax cuts, although some members probably have very strong opinions of their own.

      The Alt-Right wants to secure a future for our people where well meaning people would have the luxury to debate over those ideas, without either side intended to use them as weapons to actively harm the other. And/or an environment where groups with different interests could solve these problems in different ways.

      The Alt-Right believes that in the face of the oncoming demographic doom and permanent leftist / non-white majority, white individuals with their different ideas and opinions have no choice but to band together as a team in order to carve out a future where they will have the luxury to care about trivial nonsense like gambling laws once again.

    • American16 15 August, 2017 at 00:36 Reply

      No, that is neither good nor sustainable. It is through vigorous debate that we will change minds and end hate in our society. Every person has innate dignity, which is the source for all liberties and rights.

  27. Smash Islamophobia 14 August, 2017 at 23:56 Reply

    Vox Day and his minions are in a virtue-signaling, “muh ebil not-sees!” frenzy. No mention of court orders or police attacks, of course. Too busy gloating “Those goys over there! They’re the real Nazis!” Not us!

    • Robert Slanton 15 August, 2017 at 00:44 Reply

      Vox day is a cherokee princess. Since he doesn’t identify as white why does he presume to speak on our behalf?

    • WR_the_realist 15 August, 2017 at 03:01 Reply

      Well, if we don’t want to be called Nazis it would help if our rallies didn’t have a couple of damn fools carrying swastika flags. We know the press will demonize us but it’s stupid to make it easier for them to do this.

      • America First and ONLY America 15 August, 2017 at 07:31 Reply

        I said in another thread that, since those guys are either FBI agents or Soros employees, we really need to start beating people who wear that stuff.

        If there’s ever a rally near me that I can attend, I promise I will beat every punk I see wearing KKK or Nazi gear or flags. I’ll be arrested for assaulting an officer, but at least then the lie will be exposed.

        • marijan 15 August, 2017 at 10:35 Reply

          You’re an idiot. How about talk to them and telling them about optics instead? I’d carry a swastika just to kick your teeth in

          • Solo et Sanguis 15 August, 2017 at 10:42

            “You’re an idiot. How about talk to them and telling them about optics instead?”

            I’m not talking about optics, I’m talking about agent provocateurs sabotaging what we are trying to accomplish. That’s like saying you don’t like the color of the shirt the suicide bomber wore.

            But you want me to talk to them first, fine, I’ll go up to them and calmly and politely say “Hey, FBI, why don’t you get the hell out of here now, before things get messy? I know you’re a LEO, so don’t bother to hide it, just get the hell out of here now before I introduce you to my Louisville Slugger?”

            Then if they refuse to leave, one more warning WITH the bat, before I start swinging.

            “I’d carry a swastika just to kick your teeth in”

            Now THAT sounds like something a Soros goon would say. Right out of their playbook anyway. Only helps the media “prove” that Nazis are the violent ones. If you started a fight with me while carrying a Swastika flag, you know that would be all over the news for weeks and weeks just to discredit the Alt Right? Do you really want to benefit our enemies that way?

          • marijan 15 August, 2017 at 10:51

            Maybe they are just sympathetic to Nazi history like I am? I wouldn’t do so in public because the masses are brainwashed to hate them but this guy thinks he’s doing the right thing to change people’s minds? Doesn’t make him FBI

          • Ken31 16 August, 2017 at 13:51

            I am sure that talking first was implied, but he is probably correct when he says they are agitprop sabotaging us.

          • Solo et Sanguis 15 August, 2017 at 14:27

            Let’s be honest, how many people on this message board are actually willing to fight? I would wager very few. Often for good reason: they have families/jobs, they don’t want to go to jail, they don’t want to get beaten/killed by the cops, they don’t want to be blacklisted for future employment, etc.

            Like Jefferson said, people will put up with abuse as long as they can suffer the abuse (paraphrased). But when people are pushed to the breaking point, they will fight back, at least that’s my hope. I don’t see it happening yet. Still have folks like Richard trying to keep everyone peaceful, and trying to use the rules of our enemies to beat our enemies (though I don’t know how effective that will prove to be – I have very little faith that filing lots of lawsuits will win us many victories in the coming months or years – especially since the government itself decides if they will be a party to a suit, and if they don’t want to, they’ll just tell the judge to dismiss the case).

            I have a decent job but could probably easily find a new one, no relationships, no close family, so I am willing to fight if it comes down to it. I know I’ll lose everything as a result, but I don’t have much to lose anyway. There are plenty of young white dudes situated far worse than I am who – I hope – are feeling the same way. But again, so far I am not seeing it.

  28. Mikhail Byelii 14 August, 2017 at 23:36 Reply

    I use to love Rush. I’d go to great lengths to stream his show when I’m overseas. I used to wonder who could possible replace Rush. He seemed indispensable.

    Today I cancelled my subscription to Rush and stopped following him on YouTube.

    • Brian Thomas 15 August, 2017 at 06:59 Reply

      As did I. My first exposure to Rush was in early 1990 when he hosted one episode of the Pat Sajak show. Now that was a breath of fresh air, getting up in the faces of “feminazis” and showing how unhinged and psychotic they are. Never saw anything like that back then. He was great for being a loud, vocal “fuck you” to the cultural Marxism which, by then, was already the dominant paradigm. It was edgy then, for sure. But now….

  29. Walter Oleg 14 August, 2017 at 22:55 Reply

    Can’t we connect with boomercucks on the freedom of association issue?

    It’s all about the right to exclude.

    If you “demand inclusion” you’re a looser.

    Wouldn’t Ann Rand agree?

    • Albionic American 14 August, 2017 at 23:48 Reply

      I think you meant to write Ayn Rand.

      The Rand cultists, predominantly Jews, generally agree with our elites’ utopianism about the wonders of diversity, endless immigration, women’s sterile sexual freedom and so forth. They think of themselves as guardians of a radical adversarial philosophy which challenges the corrupt and powerful, but no one arranges for hostile mobs to pepper-spray Rand cultists at their public events, throw bottles of urine at them, hit them with socks full of batteries, say we should “punch Objectivists,” and so forth, because our elites just don’t find them threatening at all.

      I mean, I can guarantee that no elitist at the Bilderberg or Davos level has ever lost sleep because of anything Ayn Rand ever wrote. “Oh no, Rand said that Victor Hugo was the greatest romantic novelist in the 19th Century! How do we respond to this challenge to our authority about the novels we want people to read?”

      If you’ve skimmed through enough Rand propaganda, you can the ridiculousness of her intellectual pretensions. She invented her philosophy of Objectivism mainly as a form of theater, where you dress and act in certain ways for spectators, instead of coming up with a practical philosophy which guides you to solve real problems.

      And that makes sense in a way, because Rand from early in her life cared mainly about novels, films and movies – make-believe in other words.

      But then, what would you expect in a philosophy invented by a girl?

      And yet, does the Alt Right incorporate part of the spirit of what she wrote? She said we should live selfishly, esteem ourselves and tell the parasites with their hands out for gibs to go fuck off. We generally do that, but on a collective level in response to the organized efforts to dispossess us and our people.

  30. Polar Girl 14 August, 2017 at 22:04 Reply

    Nobody ever heard a lefty say, “Republicans are the real communists”.

    It doesn’t matter what non-whites do to whites: rape, murder, terrorism; never will you hear a Democrat politician punch left to denounce it.

    Stupid Boomer cucks think they are being politically chivalrous following a rule of political war that requires them to remove banned human resources (white “racists”) that are benefiting them as an act of ‘honor’ against an utterly machiavellianist opponent fighting unrestricted total warfare.

    • Brian Thomas 15 August, 2017 at 07:05 Reply

      This is true. I keep trying to beat into the skulls of libertarians and cucks that politics isn’t a fucking debate club. They seriously think it is. They think that if you just wax eloquent about “muh principles” and “muh Constitution”, that the other side will just see “reason” and come to agree with you. As a result, they viciously turn on anyone on the right who doesn’t share their saccharine view of the political, claiming that “only leftists think like that!!” So long as they persist in their delusion, I end the conversations with “…and this is precisely why NOTHING has been conserved for the past generation or two, and why the Left has completely run roughshod over all our institutions.”

      • Polar Girl 15 August, 2017 at 12:18 Reply

        Libertarians are essentially neoliberals with a delusional belief that the globalist vision of the world being slaves to billionaires can be achieved and maintained with a minimal amount of government. Neoliberals know better that an extremely brutal authoritarian one world government is the only possible way to make that happen.

  31. Evolver1 14 August, 2017 at 21:42 Reply

    Rush may be learning, but a couple of years ago he used to praise Black athletes because they were good at running and jumping because they trained hard. In reality, it is genes. Lately he hasn’t been saying that, so maybe he’s learned a little.

    A race horse does not beat a plow horse because the race horse trains harder–it’s his genes. Same with people.

    • WR_the_realist 15 August, 2017 at 02:58 Reply

      Actually a successful black basketball or football player has good genes and works very hard. I don’t care what genes you were born with, if you’re a slacker you’ll never play pro ball. OTOH, if you have my genes you can train 15 hours a day for years and you’ll still never play pro ball.

      • Captain John Charity Spring MA 15 August, 2017 at 06:45 Reply

        It helps for
        Example to be well over 6ft. That’s genes dude. No one under 6ft is competitive. Also sports need a massive infrastructure to exist as they do in the US to even give blacks a constructive hobby like B-Ball.

        • Solo et Sanguis 15 August, 2017 at 11:07 Reply

          “No one under 6ft is competitive”

          Well there were a few pretty famous BBallers under 6′ – though you are right, they are by far the exception and not the rule. I don’t know that someone like Spud Web (5’7″) or Muggsy Bogues (5’3″) could be hired by the NBA today. There are two that currently play at the height of 5’9″ however. But out of a couple hundred dudes, that’s not many.

      • Evolver1 15 August, 2017 at 08:18 Reply

        Many Blacks who are successful in running and jumping sports are drug addicts and criminals who do not work very hard in sports.

        Here’s the bet. I’ll put my money on a Greyhound that has never trained,and you put your money on a Dachshund that trains all the time and let’s see who wins a race.

  32. Athelstan 14 August, 2017 at 20:56 Reply

    It’s true Nazism did eventually take on a right wing form after the night of the long knives but I would say neither Italian fascism, Spanish fascism nor early Germany fascism were characteristically right wing. In reality it was Conservative elements who were the greatest threat to people like Ernst Rohm, Jose Antonio Primo de Rivera, Georg Strasser etc.

    Even the Nazi anthem talks of “Rotfront und Reaktion” as if to equivocate the Communist and Conservatives in the level of threat.

    • Jaggers 14 August, 2017 at 21:18 Reply

      One of the interesting things about that line is that there’s a bit of ambiguity as to whether the SA members being referenced were shot by the “Rotfront und Reaktion”, or whether the SA shot them!

  33. CallahanAuto 14 August, 2017 at 20:28 Reply

    Michael Savage talks about borders, language and culture like he invented it, but insists that he doesn’t “cross the Rubicon” to racism. Big-time cognitive dissonance.

    • Evolver1 15 August, 2017 at 18:07 Reply

      He is Jewish and has a Jewish world view. He may cross into our territory from time to time, but scratch the surface and you’ll see why he stops where he stops.

      • CallahanAuto 15 August, 2017 at 18:18 Reply

        Oh, I kind of agree with that. I think he doesn’t “cross the Rubicon” of race because he wants to protect his job … that might be as big a factor as his Jewish world view. He is as pro-white as you’re going to get on mass-market talk radio. He often talks about “The Eddies,” who are the guts of America.

  34. KiddBlast 14 August, 2017 at 20:07 Reply

    Growing up in the years after WWII, the boomer was temporally much closer to wartime events and had a heightened awareness that tons of Gis lost their lives fighting the Germans in Europe. Prime time tv series like “Combat” and (((Hollywood))) feature films brought the war into family living rooms and cinemas on a regular basis and solidified the idea of the Kraut-Nazi bogeyman. Thus the boomer shows a reflexive and vehement rejection of all things he considers “Nazi”, “racist” and “anti-Semitic” and projects these concepts – sometimes idiotically and entirely out of context – onto people, groups, ideas and events in the present. This conditioning, combined with the CultMarx sewage that has seeped into American culture since 1945, also makes him blind to racial reality and the threat it poses to the generations that came after him. He lives according to the doctrine “After me, the deluge!”, and why not? He got his piece of the action while the getting was good. The GIs who made sacrifices and died to enable his standard of living were infinitely more red pilled on race and culture than he will ever be.

    He still doesn’t get the fact that demography is destiny; or if he does
    he won’t dare admit it.

    He still doesn’t get the fact that population replacement will destroy
    the birthright of his descendants – if he sired any – and nullify their
    precious Constitution.

    He’s still deathly afraid of being called a “racist”.

    • Ken31 16 August, 2017 at 14:01 Reply

      As a percentage of the male population, not many Americans were lost in WW2 (esp compared to the rest of the participants). That is one of the competitive advantages the USA had post war.

      However, the loss and cultural impact of a large number of men dying can never be over-estimated, IMO.

  35. Ajudeo 14 August, 2017 at 19:40 Reply

    Mount Rushmore has to be Destroyed…….

    They were all White ‘Racists’…….

    All the Founding Fathers must be taken off our Coins and Currency……..

    They were all White ‘Racists’……..

    Sounds Insane……

    But, this is the Left of Today……..

      • Drew Bowler 14 August, 2017 at 23:04 Reply

        No, that’s the reality of this slippery slope. They have been damning the Founding Fathers for decades now. They have been damning the Confederacy for about 20-30 years previous. At this accelerated rate of White demonization, I give it another decade or less before they start removing all vestiges of the FF from our society…. WAIT, it already happened… Jefferson was replaced by Harriet Tubman on the twenty dollar bill. Who’s spinning fairy tales now, Mr. Ministry of Truth? P.S., if you don’t get that reference don’t feel bad, not too many cucks do. It’s from the novel 1984, you should read it. Might TRULY enlighten you a bit.

          • Captain John Charity Spring MA 15 August, 2017 at 06:49

            George Orwell was an Mi5 agent. A colonial police man in Burma and a BBC censor. He was educated the expensive way at Eton.

          • Drew Bowler 20 August, 2017 at 16:28

            Yes, he was a socialist, which was his only failing that I know of. He was obviously very insightful on the pitfalls of various forms of tyrannical governments. Socialism is very idealistic, but at the same time, very unachievable. It always devolves into anarchy because there is always a ruling class that pits the various factions against one another, especially in a heterogeneous population. Just look at Venezuela as a current example. Capitalism works, but only with constraints such as monopoly control, maintaining control over your banking and monetary systems and the like. Crony capitalism likewise never works, it also devolves into anarchy, as evidenced in Amerika today.

          • Stokely Carmichael 22 August, 2017 at 22:31

            Sorry for the late reply. I actually just come on here to entertain myself and see the nonsense I get in reply. Yours was a very articulate and reasonable response and ergo, argument. Orwell was a product of the British class system and it’s hideously worse cousin, the Indian caste system. I could argue that India is a fine example of how Capitalism doesn’t work and now, hence the rise of many formerly upwardly mobile Americans that now live in poverty, is a better example of how Capitalism ultimately consumes itself. That being said, you are atypical of the type of respondent normally on here. To be 100% honest, I doubt I could change your mind, nor could you change mine. It’s just refreshing to hear someone who obviously understands things and doesn’t just bang on about Jews/Niggers & Global Governments coming “to git our guns”. Whether you believe me or not, I think you, much like me has the best interests of America at heart, regardless of personal dogma.Good luck. Cheers.

  36. Albionic American 14 August, 2017 at 19:12 Reply

    You have to sell the Alt Right’s world view to normie white Americans by asking them point blank how their lives could possibly get worse in a white ethnostate.

    Because I see the following as unarguable selling points for white people of a country run along Alt Right lines:

    Livable cities, instead of cities which look like movie sets for the zombie apocalypse.

    The comfort of seeing people who look like you and speak your language when you go out in public.

    The improved health and zest for living you’ll enjoy from restoring a sense of community with people like yourself; spending more time outdoors; not eating food harvested, processed or served by POC’s with dubious hygiene and tropical microorganisms and parasites in their bodies; and the recovery of your adrenal glands as you no longer experience the chronic fight-or-flight reaction that happens when you encounter diversity.

    More money in your pocket because you won’t have to pay diversity taxes.

    I mean, seriously, the benefits of a white ethnostate go on and on, and they will probably compound over time. We need to put a lot more emphasis on this in our propaganda war.

    • Wild Bill 14 August, 2017 at 19:18 Reply

      Great idea. And as the left’s propaganda gets more and more bizarre and unbelievable, our presentation of the advantages of the White Ethnostate will seem more and more credible.

      • Albionic American 14 August, 2017 at 19:21 Reply

        We offer white Americans bread-and-butter benefits that they can all understand, because they have experienced the declining quality of life on a daily basis that we would make a lot better for them by enacting policies of “reversity.”

    • iggyauggie 14 August, 2017 at 19:23 Reply

      They like the caste system. The upper class white suburbs are the priestly caste. They dont have crime and they already have money.

      • Wild Bill 14 August, 2017 at 19:30 Reply

        Fine, as long as they don’t try to admit non-Whites into their supposed “priestly caste” while relegating purebred White people to the “untouchable caste.” If they think that is going to fly, they are in for a rude awakening.

        • iggyauggie 14 August, 2017 at 19:36 Reply

          They dont understand why we dont want to embrace the caste system. The only good thing they can do for us is to fear antifa and violence. Riots in cities freak them out. They work/play downtown. The city dindus are zoned out. The college towns are a good front but it doesnt threaten the rich suburbanites of big cities.

          • KiddBlast 14 August, 2017 at 20:34

            …yet.

            I’m beginning to believe that the only thing that will convince them of racial reality is when the dindus visit calamity upon them.

          • Fr. John+ 15 August, 2017 at 07:21

            I WANT Nobility back. I am sick to DEATH of the fallacy of Equality. The Bible does not contain ‘all men are created equal,’ and it’s about damn time we realize that the Xenos, the illiterate, the sexually perverted, the abortionizing whore, and the Liberal are NOT our equals.

          • Nightmare 15 August, 2017 at 07:44

            All men are Created equal. All men are born equal, equally naked, squalling, ignorant. After that it’s bloody dog-eat-dog competition and the Devil takes the hindermost. Thank God for all of my privileges and our privileges. God Bless you. God Bless US Bitter Clingers.

            I’m 68 y.o., with +4 sd cognitive privilege.

          • Maple Curtain 15 August, 2017 at 12:20

            Very succinct. I’ve often said it myself, and it needs repeating until all of the smug bastards are out of power and into their boxes.

            On the other hand, he “deserves,” apparently, that supposed +4 s.d. intellect.*

            And, he’s a self-made man, too, I’m sure.

            Us Gen-Xers and you Millennials are just a bunch of whiners who don’t want to work…

          • Fr. John+ 15 August, 2017 at 20:11

            Funny. God clearly points out that gifts are HIS to bestow, and while ontologically one ‘could’ say, All I have is from God, that’s not what you said. Breeding will out, as the old adage goes. I’d rather have a noble Gentlemen as my liege Lord, than some of these Cucked Senators of the Egalitarian filth.

          • Maple Curtain 15 August, 2017 at 20:21

            “Breeding will out” is largely b.s. a lie perpetuated by those who are not aristocratic but who wish to pass on pseudo-hereditary titles like, you know, U.S. Senator, for one.

            There is, of course, regression to the mean, which is why dynastic rule is not going to be benevolent but will result in psychopathic tyrants in power.

            Do the names Kennedy, McCain and Gore signify “breeding” to you?

          • Fr. John+ 15 August, 2017 at 20:10

            All men are born sinners. I grant you that. But that isn’t equality, that’s a curse. And you KNOW what I meant…

          • Vincent Law 15 August, 2017 at 11:10

            Yes, the coming war will be between the Good Huwhytes and their POC auxillaries vs the Bad Whites.

      • Jarl 15 August, 2017 at 11:37 Reply

        That’s why I argued that we should support the Obama plans of moving section 8 blacks into these nice white suburbs. We will see how they like it when their property values are cut in half and their “good schools” become gang turf.

        • tsnamm 15 August, 2017 at 23:08 Reply

          Unfortunately it wasn’t the “nice white” suburbs, i.e. political/business class rich that were planned. It was to accelerate “diversity” in those working and middle class white suburbs that refused to submit. A lot of local governments had already used the sub prime mortgage meltdown to drop section 8 nogs into these neighborhoods already. By having HUD threaten lawsuits would have simply accelerated the process. The liberals gated community whitopias are never on the radar.

          • Jarl 16 August, 2017 at 10:17

            True. Similar to how they advocate high income tax for top earners, which falls on the upper middle class rather because the super rich have their wealth in assets or hidden and do not have much “income.”

        • Drew Bowler 18 August, 2017 at 20:30 Reply

          I, with a few friends, started a gofundme project to raise funds to buy a house in Nasty Pelosi’s gated community a few years ago and give as many day laborers the gate code to crash on the lawn, her lawn, where ever. Of course it got shut down, but what a just reward that would be for the traitorous bitch to get.

          • Jarl 21 August, 2017 at 19:06

            That’s how we win. We need to start donating money to house inner city yoofs next door to every politician and CEO house. We wouldn’t even need to associate it with alt right. Just promote it as a shitlib cause to “end white supremacy” and “desegregate the 1%” or whatever and spread it around on reddit.

    • Dr. Franklin Jefferson 14 August, 2017 at 21:47 Reply

      Your beliefs don’t map to reality. If you’re interested in improving peoples’ lives, that’s an extreme vulnerability. If you find yourself surrounded by paranoiacs and sociopaths, maybe fixing your cognition should be a priority. Try bringing some actual science into your Utopian fantasies, instead of pure drama-queen aesthetics.

        • zeb 15 August, 2017 at 13:43 Reply

          Doc Frank, pearls at pigs, shit stain millennials have a hard time with logic that takes more than two words to develop.
          Next time try something like this, “Fuck you faggot.”

        • Dr. Franklin Jefferson 15 August, 2017 at 23:04 Reply

          The argument is clear to literate persons, like the one I was replying to. I’ll use pretty pictures for you next time, or take zeb’s advice.

          • Maple Curtain 15 August, 2017 at 23:31

            “Your beliefs don’t map to reality” is not an argument; it is a statement of fact which went unsupported by either argument or evidence.

            You’re out of your depth, narcissus.

      • America First and ONLY America 15 August, 2017 at 07:27 Reply

        This is what I struggle with most and what most frustrates me. I don’t understand how anyone wants to off not only themselves, but everyone they share their race with. What good could that possibly do them, or do they figure they’ll be dead before the genocide is complete? I’m guessing the latter since they rarely have kids anymore.

        • Sven 15 August, 2017 at 15:28 Reply

          They’re ignorant and afraid. Clearly you are different and you will likely be plagued by this for the rest of your life.

          “With greater knowledge comes greater sorrow”.

        • tsnamm 15 August, 2017 at 23:12 Reply

          “…or do they figure they’ll be dead before the genocide is complete?”

          That’s EXACTLY what they think. Even the ones who aren’t on board with “diversity”. Boomers are totally infected with this mindset worst of all.

  37. Wild Bill 14 August, 2017 at 19:02 Reply

    Rush likes to call his show “the cutting edge of societal evolution.”

    But it looks like the Alt-right has taken over that role.

    • Solo et Sanguis 15 August, 2017 at 10:55 Reply

      I only caught a small snippet of his show driving into the office yesterday, but the part I caught reflected how I feel right now. That he was calling out the president and numerous republicans for not specifically calling out the BLM and Antifa for their terroristic actions. Worse, I am very pissed at Trump for exacerbating the ire toward the Alt Right instead of calling for investigations into the BLM/Antifa. They got away with everything under Obama – I kinda hoped that my vote for Trump would lead to them being held accountable now. But I guess I was duped yet again.

      • Wild Bill 15 August, 2017 at 15:10 Reply

        I have no idea how it is going to happen, but I think Antifa is headed for a rude awakening. No group of misguided idealists can avoid encountering reality for very long.

        • Solo et Sanguis 15 August, 2017 at 15:13 Reply

          Their professors, handlers, the media, and now even our own President, are doing a good job of shielding them from reality, unfortunately. I still hold out hope that one day they will be held accountable, but that light of hope grows dimmer by the day. If our “Rule of Law” won’t hold them accountable, and we ourselves won’t hold them immediately accountable, then they are unaccountable to any consequences.

  38. Wild Bill 14 August, 2017 at 18:55 Reply

    Fine article, Mr. Jaggers. You did a great job describing the dilemma Rush and Hannity are facing. As a follow-up you might want to write about how the Alt-right is gradually shifting the Overton Window so that Rush and Hannity can now take stances that they would have never dared to take five years ago.

    • Doland G. Turmp 14 August, 2017 at 23:56 Reply

      Hannity is more Alt Right than Rush, and it seems like he’s getting more so.
      I unironically watch Tucker and him on youtube (lol)

      • Gwynn Ap Nudd 15 August, 2017 at 01:58 Reply

        Not today he wasn’t: he was absolutely vicious and horrible. We’re just as bad as BLM, as if they have equal claim to American and its history. I couldn’t listen past two minutes.

        • Skorzeny44 15 August, 2017 at 03:55 Reply

          Hannity is full-on neocon, and has been from the beginning. I remember him back before the Iraq War being completely on the Bush train, pushing for invasion of Iraq. Hannity is a puppet of the establishment, even though he claims to be against it. Now he is just Trump’s puppet.

  39. iggyauggie 14 August, 2017 at 18:50 Reply

    Thats the Boomer elite. The miltia boomers are blaming antifa. They are coming around. They never had leaders

    • Wild Bill 14 August, 2017 at 18:58 Reply

      “The miltia boomers are blaming Antifa.”
      Right. The Alt-right has shifted the Overton Window, so they can do that now.

      • iggyauggie 14 August, 2017 at 19:02 Reply

        I stay on facebook. Ive been working the boomers for 2 years. Their instinct is to cuck but you can reason them out of it. Then they change their view without saying anything. Its truly fucking amazing

          • iggyauggie 14 August, 2017 at 19:40

            We shouldnt hate the boomers so much. They are just fucked in the head. Certain talking points work on them.

          • Drew Bowler 14 August, 2017 at 23:06

            They are after all the generation that spawned the hippies, vile little creatures they are. Thank GOD they are dying off.

          • iggyauggie 15 August, 2017 at 12:57

            What do you want to see? This morning all the Boomers are talking about civil war against the liberals(not race war). We are in great shape IMO.

          • iggyauggie 15 August, 2017 at 16:32

            Violence from the left unites the right. They hate commies. They hate globalists. Globalists control hordes of socialists/commies. Be antisocialist as much as possible. Not talking about economics, just the culture war. Invent new terms for old ideas. Nationalism works. You unite the right by being antisocial. The worse the left gets, the more nervious the right gets. A white Civil war, not a race war. Another revolution against the elites. The white liberals want to use brown people against us. All the black nationalists see it too. They are dropping out. Focus on white liberals. Use their brainwashing against them and make white liberals the evil racist whites.

          • iggyauggie 15 August, 2017 at 16:35

            They cant talk about race. They are either too racist or too brainwashed. The best they can do is liking being white while saying they wont apologize for it. You just got to work with that. Focus on commies.

          • iggyauggie 15 August, 2017 at 16:38

            Western civ = white supremacy. If they accept that, they accept they are “racist”. Best you can do wiith them

    • Rascal 15 August, 2017 at 05:28 Reply

      Boomer dad watched the periscopes instead of fox news and the “you will not replace us” chants by young white men was a slap in the face.

      • iggyauggie 15 August, 2017 at 12:23 Reply

        Most of the III% militia boomers are on facebook. The unitetheright rally was discussed a lot before hand. The rally caused a divide and a lot of oathcuckers were talking shit. After shit when down, those people flooded everything bitching about david duke blah blah blah. Half the posts I’d see would bitch about nazis and kkks. Once videos started coming in of people being stalked and beaten, their hatred of the left started kicking in. When Trump said KKK and Nazi without saying ANTIFA, they were pissed at Trump. Huge case of whataboutism. By sunday night, most of the posts i seen were militia people proclaiming their pride in being white.

  40. Gubbler Chechenova 14 August, 2017 at 18:40 Reply

    You know, I don’t mind being labeled ‘leftist’.

    I am neo-fascist, and fascism was a creative fusion of left and right.

    There are good leftist ideas and good rightist ideas. Why should I just choose one side?

    I wanna be creative.

    I wanna be National Left. I think we need some socialism because capitalism is only about profit and greed. In a purely capitalist system, rich whites prefer the company and alliance of rich non-whites while snubbing poorer whites. Only social-nationalism can bind rich whites and poor whites as one people.

    So, I’m a left-rightist, or fascist.

      • Captain John Charity Spring MA 15 August, 2017 at 06:55 Reply

        Natsoc was quite specific and peculiar to Germany. I do actually consider them (Germans) to have been the masters of the battlefield and truly inventive and great. But that is why the rest had to take them down. I don’t think the French, Russ or Brits or white America (the other great people’s) could operate at the level of the Germans. Just Zerg rush them.

    • Skorzeny44 15 August, 2017 at 04:09 Reply

      No need for all of that fuss, just call yourself a “Fascist” and leave it at that. Mussolini was right, just as the original National Socialists were right- a fusion of nationalism and non-Marxist socialism.

  41. Cuckblocker 14 August, 2017 at 18:06 Reply

    Dealing with children requires great care and attention to detail. Being the baby boomer reality perception baby sitters, I feel efforts to redpill them are a complete waste of effort and time. We just need to control them with happy stories and fairy tales until they go to heaven.

    • Yehudah Finkelstein 14 August, 2017 at 18:11 Reply

      They’re old. We need to seize power from them now, and prevent any Gen Xers who made it from gaining power.

        • Yehudah Finkelstein 14 August, 2017 at 20:57 Reply

          Yes, I’ve said this before. Good observation. Millenials will just take over after Trump or Pence.

          • Robert Bruce 15 August, 2017 at 01:06

            Big frigging deal. All you will get are a new batch of psychos spawned by the old psychos. This is getting to be pathetic!!!! Boomers thought they would change the world and they ended up on
            Wall St 20 years later. You think Millennials are a different animal, you are fooling yourself.

      • Robert Bruce 15 August, 2017 at 01:50 Reply

        Why skip the
        Xers? We happen to be the most over represented generation in the
        American workforce today. We are too young to retire and are the last generation to have an old school work ethic, and most importantly still maintained replacement birthrates. Your attitude mirrors that of the liberal
        Boomers. They thought they were the chosen ones to right the ship, only to sell out and make things worse when they attained the power they so wanted as youths. You aren’t the first generation to think like that, nor the last, but don’t think you are going to be any different.

      • Captain John Charity Spring MA 15 August, 2017 at 06:59 Reply

        Thank you for the generational hate bro. I too think that no GenX will ever be President. However think on this Azzmador is GenX, an early one.

    • Robert Bruce 15 August, 2017 at 01:31 Reply

      Yeah right, you are the adults. Do you have a family or a real job? Totally delusional. Millennials have the lowest skill set of the 3 generations still in the workforce today.

      • Cuckblocker 15 August, 2017 at 03:35 Reply

        I was talking about your conditioned ego and mind. Skill set? Do you need to teach me how to “run the computer” lol
        Hitler was Right

      • Captain John Charity Spring MA 15 August, 2017 at 06:58 Reply

        Millenials are mostly blacks browns and yellows. The dwindling white segment is stewed.

  42. Cynic 14 August, 2017 at 17:38 Reply

    Boomers have been indoctrinated since birth and to this day watch television unironically. What’s the average age of a CNN viewer? 60? 70?

    Millenials and Gen Zyklon are online and don’t give a damn what Wolf Blitzer and his ilk think.

    • Robert Bruce 14 August, 2017 at 18:10 Reply

      Really? Who is getting indoctrinated with multiculturalism 24/7 since they were toddlers? Boomers and Xers escaped that entirely. It is easy to blame previous generations, but without those people you wouldn’t exist today. Quit whining! It is easy to talk tough if you don’t have a family to provide for, etc. At least the Boomers replaced themselves. A lot of you don’t even have girlfriends. Better get to work!!!!!

      • A hymn to Hermes 14 August, 2017 at 18:33 Reply

        Who is getting indoctrinated with multiculturalism 24/7 since they were toddlers? Boomers and Xers escaped that entirely.

        Not all. What are you talking about? I’ve got late boomer parents, and I’m on the millenial/Xer cusp and everyone in this 2 generation demo was getting the full lampshades and soap since elementary school.

        Keep in mind everything you see in the 60s in public had been in academia since at least the interwar period in the west and was absolutely in public schools by the 50s. You can go watch Cold War reels which define “American” without any reference to race, ethnicity, religion, language or culture. The American public’s identity was being deconstructed into a proto-marxist, materialist economic man by the 50s.

        • Robert Bruce 14 August, 2017 at 18:57 Reply

          I am 47 and never had anything near the level of indoctrination the youth of today get. The gay rights thing was in its infancy back then, etc. I am talking mid 80’s to early 90’s.

          • A hymn to Hermes 14 August, 2017 at 19:18

            Yeah, you are right about advanced poz, but I think its’ misleading to say boomers and Xers totally avoided left-wing propaganda. The sexual politics are a higher level of the heirarchy of postmodern deconstruction, and the groundwork was being laid in public schools and on television before you were born.

            The fact that your typical boomer and Xer “conservative” is basically an anarchist who believes deeply in equality and defines these things as fundamentally “conservative” didn’t happen organically.

          • Robert Bruce 14 August, 2017 at 22:26

            What it is, is that they grew up. Not bashing millenials, but your predecessors went to college, got jobs, got hitched, then had kids. Kids and family are expensive, thus you are more concerned about economics and your job, etc. Every generation is thrust into slightly different circumstances than the previous one and has to adapt to the new conditions. To blame previous generations for what happens today isn’t good as the changes come really quick or ever so gradual.

          • Captain John Charity Spring MA 15 August, 2017 at 07:04

            Having the biggest demographic wave live into their 70s is killing everyone else.

        • Smash Islamophobia 15 August, 2017 at 00:02 Reply

          Boas and his acolytes pretty much controlled anthropology departments by the 1920s, with a few Carleton Coon type holdouts here and there. Full-on “race is a social construct, goyim!” propaganda started pretty much immediately post-WW2, as did the various Frankfurt School marketing campaigns (“The Authoritarian Personality,” anyone?)

          You’re correct; Robert Bruce is kind of missing the point here. Sure, the poz got more advanced in recent years, but it had already spread decades before that.

          • Robert Bruce 15 August, 2017 at 01:31

            My point is you are blaming my parents generation even when they pretty much kept rampant multiculturalism at bay and raised their kids accordingly. They kept up racial replacement rates. The fiat currency monetary system was put in place when they were kids or not even born. What the f$!# are you doing? The
            American empire was kicked off in 1898 and it has been downhill ever since. The “poz” has been around since then and has slowly been advanced over multiple generations. To single out one is moronic. Also, this notion of Millennials righting the ship is a joke. Your narcissism is lengendary. Social media addicts and generation selfie is going to change the system? Safe spaces, college kids playing with
            Play Dough?

          • Smash Islamophobia 15 August, 2017 at 01:54

            You sound like a woman. You’re apparently incapable of comprehending that not all, or even most, generalized statements are directed at you personally. That goes far beyond narcissism. Perhaps reading this might help you?
            https://infogalactic.com/info/Solipsism

            Pro tip: if you’re going to pretend to be a man, you might want to respond to empirically-based argumentation with something other than feelz.

          • Vincent Law 15 August, 2017 at 11:15

            Why are you acting like the Quintissential Boomer and closing ranks around the Boomer identity?

            Whenever Millennials get called out for being indoctrinated, spoiled little cry babies I don’t throw a fit and demand that the ALt-Right stop criticizing my gen because I’m not like that and that somehow proves something.

            Seriously, examine why you lash out like that. You Boomers act like a minority group.

        • Captain John Charity Spring MA 15 August, 2017 at 07:02 Reply

          GenX doesn’t directly remember the war or the 60s but they remember that the 1980s were good and that the 90s were fun and mostly a white thing.

        • Augur Mayson 15 August, 2017 at 13:25 Reply

          What is a ‘boomer’ as used today? Anyone over forty? Thirty? I mean, you know the Don’t Trust Anyone Over 30 thing is a very Jewed, leftist liberal commie-inspired tactic of divide and conquer right, made to cleave parts of our race away from us, even the folks more experienced because they have a few more years, theoretically at least. I’m three years younger than this guy you’re skewering as a ‘boomer’ which I won’t harp on again but I think that term makes us look silly because it’s not the right word.

          • The Dank One 15 August, 2017 at 18:32

            I’m just breaking balls, Augur. I like to have an atmosphere where we can give each other shit, but at the end of the day stand together and get this thing done.

            I have no malicious intentions. Part of what solidified my journey down this path was getting absolutely wrecked by the Daily Stormer crowd over in the ROK comments section.

            I’ll stand with any pro-White, and probably 99% of the guys who tease about this will do the same.

            We’re not going to cordon off a “boomer section” at pro-White rallies, or prevent any White man from joining based on his age. Literally nobody I know is actually excluding boomers from websites or rallies. Our young men stood right there with David Duke and the older White Nationalists in Charlottesville before they got shut down.

          • Daisy 25 August, 2017 at 05:27

            “Part of what solidified my journey down this path was getting absolutely wrecked by the Daily Stormer crowd over in the ROK comments section.”

            Just out of curiosity, what do you mean? (if you don’t mind telling me)

            By the way, I replied to you on mixed race relationships – sorry my reply was so delayed.

          • The Dank One 25 August, 2017 at 19:27

            At the time I wrote my article on Jewish feminism, I was still a Holocaust believer. When the article was published by ROK, Anglin at the Daily Stormer sent his followers over to comment (at the time, DS still used Disqus commenting, so many DS readers had accounts).

            I had made a comment about how “just because I wrote an article about the Jews behind feminism doesn’t mean I would have participated in the Holocaust”, or something along those lines. I’ve since deleted the account I was using, and many of those comments have disappeared (it has, after all, been about 2 years since it was posted).

            Anyway, I was given links to Holocaust documentaries and literature that exposed the whole thing as an elaborate post-war hoax. I realized that I had no arguments against what they were saying and that my actual understanding of the alleged events was quite pathetic. That’s what really got the ball rolling for me.

      • Jarl 15 August, 2017 at 11:47 Reply

        Nope. Multicultural stuff started in earnest in the 50s as part of the cold war strategy. Boomers were subject to psychological warfare since birth with very little alternatives.

    • Jarl 15 August, 2017 at 11:45 Reply

      They never had a chance. Imagine all information sources being controlled by the state, managers, (((etc.))). If not for the internet, most of us would be in that same boat.

    • zeb 15 August, 2017 at 13:55 Reply

      I’m 63, NEVER watch talmudvision and haven’t since childhood. Y’all generalizing dumb shit is simply divisiveness born outta the fact that y’all don’t have a pot to piss in and are irrationally jealous of those of “US” who have worked all our lives toward a comfortable retirement.
      I will confess to being blindsided about the whole KQ and white genocide issue. Guess I waz too bizzi working to see the BIG PICTURE.
      Now that I’m in a state of woke, I’m completely committed to lay it all on the line for “OUR” cause.

    • Jim 15 August, 2017 at 19:00 Reply

      People, people. Basically, anyone who has breathed oxygen at some point since the beginning of the 20th century has been indoctrinated. The catastrophic results of that indoctrination only began to manifest itself in the ’70’s, impacting Gen X children first. Everything has been spiraling out of control ever since, with some things getting worse for millennials. If it wasn’t for all the great technology, they would be in a world of hurt. So, in a sense, we are all victims. Having said that, it is almost impossible to get a baby boomer to ever admit he/she had it better and that he/she may have some culpability in screwing things up for the rest of us. Its like the 50’s and 60’s trained them to eschew taking responsibility for the health and welfare of the larger society but instead focus on their own short sighted happiness. Maybe their deep seeded self centeredness prevents them from seeing this.The point is calling each other out is not fruitful. This millennial snowflake, whiners crap, destroying America that sometimes comes from boomers is abhorrent, considering B’s had a hand in making the society we have now. Besides, half the M’s voted for Trump. As for X’s and M’s, we must remember that there was decades of propaganda piling up on the boomers that would led them astray, warping their reality. They really never stood a chance.

    • Robert Browning 14 August, 2017 at 18:04 Reply

      He is also white and part of being white is an inherent sense of fairness. What was fair about not allowing people to peacefully assembly and speak their minds to one another in public?? Rush Cucked out big time.

      • Yehudah Finkelstein 14 August, 2017 at 18:12 Reply

        Rush has always done nothing but cuck. He used to go on 2o minute rants about how the Dems and Unions ruined Detroit without ever mentioning the blacks.

    • Ernst 14 August, 2017 at 20:20 Reply

      Limbaugh speaks as someone who’s had the luxury of living most of his life in an overwhelmingly majority white world. To him, racist attacks were like little chihuahuas nipping at his heels and could be easily shrugged off. It’s nothing for him to sit here now and virtue signal since him and the rest of the boomer-cucks will never have to deal with the effects of a shrinking white population.