Culture

Australian Government Faces Blowback From Its Refugee Resettlement Program

Submitted by Henry Armitage

**

For those who don’t know, Australia has a policy of not allowing illegal boat arrivals to ever settle in the country, instead towing them out to random Pacific islands where hilarious antics ensue between them and the extravagantly bribed but resentful natives. Well, it looks like Australia will now have to either sink the boats or institute a Euro-style open-door policy for fake refugees. Bogusly renowned for being comparatively tough on immigration, the Australian Government’s regime of “offshore processing” for asylum claimants has just gone completely bust.

The Federal Government has agreed to pay compensation of $70 million to 1,905 asylum seekers detained on Manus Island between 2012 and 2016.

The group alleged the Commonwealth breached its duty of care by holding them in conditions that caused them physical and psychological harm.

During the period of their incarceration there was also a riot that resulted in the death of an asylum seeker and serious injuries to other detainees.

They also claimed they were falsely imprisoned after Papua New Guinea’s Supreme Court ruled their detention was illegal.

A Victorian Supreme Court trial against the Commonwealth and security companies Transfield and G4S was due to start today and had been expected to run for six months.

Manus Island detainees alleged they were supplied with adequate (sic) food, water, shelter, medical hygiene products and security.

So maybe we can recoup a tiny percentage of the money we’ve wasted on their services from these private security firms. But seriously, look at what has happened here: the “Supreme Court” of New Guinea, an Australian colony till 1975, has just decided that its country can renege on a deal with Australia that has already cost the latter 10 billion, thereby also opening up the Aussies to ridiculous charges including “false imprisonment” by a bunch of invasive parasites.

To be fair, conditions in the camps on PNG, Nauru, and Manus Island are probably as horrible as the left likes to claim, with sexual assault an especial problem according to an Australian Government report. But then, I guess you get what you pay for. What do you expect for just $1.2 billion a year to house a few thousand people at a time in some third-world country where the average personal income is under $4000 AUD?

In fact, it looks like the cost is even higher, with a recent report tallying it at 10 billion over just the last three years!

These centres are staffed by Papuans in PNG, Nauruans in Nauru and Manus Islanders in Manus Island. Besides the sexual emergencies and so forth among the detainees themselves, there is also the fact that you are basically hiring spear-wielding savages to oversee them.For example, back in 2015, A fuzzy-haired, bulbous-nosed oppressor murdered an Iranian (presumably intending to eat his flesh and shrink his head into a trophy). This was a scandal—in Australia, that is, where it was naturally blamed on “racist” Government policy.

The cost to the taxpayer of this 10-year-old offshore processing debacle has been massive. In the scheme of things, another $70 million is nothing; but it does feel a bit like being successfully sued for assault by someone who tried to burgle you—and whom you never actually touched. Where the analogy collapses, though, is that you don’t then have to live with your burglar afterwards, whereas these invaders are now likely to be admitted to Australia. Unless Trump wants to take a few more…?

Long under siege by the usual gang of international human rights peddlers, the policy has given Australia a false reputation for playing hardball on immigration. In fact, we have some of the highest immigration rates in the world, and prior to the 2015 “Syrian” tsunami that continues to wash over Europe, we had the world’s third-largest “refugee” intake.

But as we on the Alt-Right know, the real cost of what is going on here cannot be measured either in the premium-grade “human rights” of brown people or in our tax dollars.

Comment

45 comments

  1. Let'em Crash 17 June, 2017 at 06:22 Reply

    Keep serving up these invaders to the sago eaters. 9/10 witch doctors agree, fresh refugees reduce the chance of developing beriberi. And, don’t bribe them with cash, they only like orange soda.

  2. WR_the_realist 16 June, 2017 at 01:13 Reply

    I am waiting to see the first western country with sufficient testosterone to sink the refugee boats. Until that happens, the west is doomed.

  3. PaulMurrayCbr 15 June, 2017 at 23:06 Reply

    Why is sexual assault and rape a problem in those camps? Because of the people that are in them.

    Australia, for decades, had the sensible policy that immigrants must have useful skills. A trade. Some way to earn a living. When you take people from a war zone with not skills, no education, no way to earn a living and make their way in the world other than by violence: what are they going to do? They are going to be criminals or live on welfare. Or both.

  4. JMB 15 June, 2017 at 11:25 Reply

    Sink or just send away! Let these idiots that jump in a boat to head to a white country for free stuff die at sea. Feed the sharks! I have no love for these fakers, liars, scam artists.

  5. Syd 15 June, 2017 at 02:43 Reply

    Torpedoing their boats is the most humaine solution. The wogs know the score and stay where they belong saving them drowning. It also keeps them in their place

  6. Michael Edwards 15 June, 2017 at 02:15 Reply

    good article. right on the money. you addressed one of the two great fallacy’s about Australia. “tough on immigration” and “they took away your guns” both objectively false. the liberal party is really just posturing to pick up the anti immigration vote without really doing anything meaningful about it and thus alienating the socialists/SJW’s. note for american readers. the liberal party here is actually more like the pre-trump Republicans or cuckservatives over there and our labour party is the unionist/working class party. if you look at immigration numbers then Australia in some ways could be regarded as the Sweden of the pacific. the big difference being theres a higher proportion of east Asian immigration. though not damaging economically it is still displacing whites and creating a divided society. they decided to bring in a bunch of Africans a while ago with the entirely predictable consequences you see wherever they go.

    • stavros 15 June, 2017 at 02:29 Reply

      The africans are without a doubt the worst form of low life scum our imbecile politicians could of dumped on us.We have Australian,s homeless living in their cars and in parks and we give these animal,s priority housing and welfare,f*ckin hate our gutless government.

    • Arthur Vickstrom 16 June, 2017 at 12:42 Reply

      Agreed. I have an American friend who recently came back to the states after a three week trip to Australia and from what he’s told me the demographic situation is pretty desperate over there.

      I know it’s not ideal, but I’d recommend that every Australian Nationalist seriously think over emigrating to Britain (especially if things don’t improve within the next couple years). I personally think there’s something poetic about us concentrating the best of our people in our homeland – it’s much better than being browned out slowly in nation after nation.

      • Michael Edwards 16 June, 2017 at 23:08 Reply

        interesting idea. if the abos can claim land rights here i dont see why i cant claim land rights back in England. i can prove where my ancestors came from so if theres some paki living there now ill just tell him to piss off because this is my ancestral land! oh hang on sorry i forgot whites dont count as a people with a heritage worth preserving.

        • Arthur Vickstrom 17 June, 2017 at 01:38 Reply

          You should make a YouTube video demanding the return of your ancient hamlet (*now a skyscraper filled with Pakis*). It’d be hilarious.

          #GiveItBack #StopStealingOurHistory

    • Moishe-the-Beagle 15 June, 2017 at 07:30 Reply

      Realistically you’d probably have to sink several, looking at the slow learning curve of those crossing the Mediterranean. give them a 50/50 chance of being shark meat or living on welfare in free housing in a white country, and you know they’ll roll the dice.

  7. Ike35 14 June, 2017 at 23:33 Reply

    Maybe they should’ve just sent these nation wreckers back to the hollowing wildreness from whence they came instead of warehousing them on nearby islands. Just another example of how half-measures don’t work.

  8. stavros 14 June, 2017 at 19:31 Reply

    Good article Henry you should send a copy to our goldman sachs bought prime minister maybe he could pass it on to his good friends at the abc.As an Aussie i know how biased our media are so please any thing you can publish that exposes the rot that infests our political system i would like to read.

        • Yehudah Finkelstein 14 June, 2017 at 19:37 Reply

          See my post below. Kon Karapanagiotidis. He’s a virtue signalling faggot who runs a non-profit (don’t know the Aussie term for those) that seeks to inundate Oz with Muslim and non-white refugees. i’m not even Australian but I’ve seen this guy’s crap all over Twitter.

          • stavros 14 June, 2017 at 19:45

            Thanks for the heads up i don,t have twitter or facebook so i don,t think i will read much of what the troll has to say unless he comes to this site or infowars i am old and don,t trust the internet,also Stavros is my nick name real name is steve.I like much of what you post so Best regards “steve”